Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Practice variation in total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for treatment of fractured neck of femur in Australia.|
|Epworth Authors:||de Steiger, Richard|
|Other Authors:||Harris, Ian A.|
Lewis, Peter L.
|Keywords:||Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture|
Femoral Neck Fracture
Total Hip Arthroplasty
Femoral Head Arthroplasty
Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry
Musculoskeletal Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia
|Publisher:||The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery|
|Citation:||Bone Joint J, 101(1), 92-95.|
|Abstract:||AIMS: Displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) may be treated with partial (hemiarthroplasty, HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA), with recent recommendations advising that THA be used in community-ambulant patients. This study aims to determine the association between the proportion of FNF treated with THA and year of surgery, day of the week, surgeon practice, and private versus public hospitals, adjusting for known confounders. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 67 620 patients in the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) from 1999 to 2016 inclusive were used to generate unadjusted and adjusted analyses of the associations between patient, time, surgeon and institution factors, and the proportion of FNF treated with THA. RESULTS: Overall, THA was used in 23.7% of patients. THA was more frequently used over time, in younger patients, in healthier patients, in cases performed on weekdays (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.27; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 1.41), in private hospitals (adjusted OR 4.34; 95% CI 3.94 to 4.79) and by surgeons whose hip arthroplasty practice has a relatively higher proportion of elective patients (adjusted OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.49 to 1.83). CONCLUSION: Practice variation exists in the proportion of FNF patients treated with THA due to variables other than patient factors. This may reflect variation in resources available and surgeon preference, and uncertainty regarding the relative indication.|
|Journal Title:||The Bone & Joint Journal|
|Affiliated Organisations:||Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, Australia.|
|Type of Clinical Study or Trial:||Comparative Study|
|Appears in Collections:||Musculoskeletal|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in EKB are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.