<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Epworth Collection:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11434/8</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 21:04:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-06-19T21:04:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Guideline of guidelines: pelvic lymph node dissection at time of radical prostatectomy.</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2429</link>
      <description>Title: Guideline of guidelines: pelvic lymph node dissection at time of radical prostatectomy.
Epworth Authors: Carll, Jonathon; Lawrentschuk, Nathan
Abstract: Objective: To provide a comprehensive review, analysis and critique of guidelines from various oncological and urological organisations regarding the use pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for primary treatment of prostate cancer (PCa).&#xD;
&#xD;
Methods: PubMed, Google Scholar and the official webpages of major urological and oncological societies were searched for PCa guidelines. Guidelines were assessed for recommendations and opinions regarding the use of PLND. A total of 15 guidelines were identified and included for this review.&#xD;
&#xD;
Results: There is consensus amongst guidelines that an extended template (ePLND), is the preferred templated when PLND is to be undertaken. The majority of guidelines acknowledge the lack of proven oncological benefit from PLND, and that the largest benefit is from improved staging information. However, there is significant divergence between the guidelines about which patients should undergo PLND. Some guidelines advocate for the abandonment of PLND altogether, whilst others adopt a risk-stratified approach, suggesting that patients should be offered PLND based on nomograms or clinical risk stratification.&#xD;
&#xD;
Conclusion: Whilst ePLND is recommended by some guidelines for select patients undergoing RP, it remains a contentious topic with significant discordance between guidelines regarding patient selection. Given the lack of proven oncological benefit and significant morbidity from the procedure, careful selection is required. It is uncertain as to how pathological findings on PLND will change management given recent trends towards salvage rather than adjuvant radiotherapy, and improved preoperative staging with prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computed tomography.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2429</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Innovative approaches for managing relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma.</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2428</link>
      <description>Title: Innovative approaches for managing relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma.
Epworth Authors: Grainger, Brian; Abeyakoon, Chathuri; Prince, Miles
Abstract: Introduction: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are a heterogeneous group of hematologic malignancies arising from mature, post-thymic T- and natural killer (NK) cells. This review explores innovative approaches to managing relapsed or refractory PTCL, emphasising the need for tailored treatment strategies given the generally poor prognosis associated with these entities.&#xD;
&#xD;
Areas covered: Literature selection followed a comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE up to 2026. The conventional frontline approach remains cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP)-based chemotherapy. However, the addition of brentuximab vedotin (BV) has improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in specific subtypes, particularly anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). Despite these advances, most patients experience disease relapse or are primary refractory, highlighting a persistent unmet clinical need. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) offers curative potential for selected patients, but biological and logistical barriers constrain its wider application.&#xD;
&#xD;
Expert opinion: These advances support a shift toward a more personalised management strategy, prioritising immunotherapies, epigenetically directed therapies, and small-molecule inhibitors, tailored to disease subtype. By outlining current challenges and emerging treatment modalities, we aim to guide clinicians in optimising care for this patient population.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2428</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>An evaluation of elranatamab for the treatment of myeloma: current evidence for treating relapsed/refractory disease and future directions.</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2419</link>
      <description>Title: An evaluation of elranatamab for the treatment of myeloma: current evidence for treating relapsed/refractory disease and future directions.
Epworth Authors: Bayly-McCredie, Elena; Prince, Miles; Yannakoua, Costas; Fiorenza, Salvatore; Wisniowskia, Brendan
Abstract: The development of B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed therapies has been a significant advancement for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Elranatamab is a bispecific antibody (BsAb) targeting BCMA and CD3.  It has achieved regulatory approval in several jurisdictions worldwide for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.  Clinical trials of elranatamab in various settings are currently ongoing.&#xD;
&#xD;
This article describes the current evidence for treating relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with elranatamab. A search for relevant literature was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and hematology conference abstracts published between 2017 and 2025. Citation mining of the included studies was also conducted.&#xD;
&#xD;
Elranatamab monotherapy has demonstrated manageable safety and encouraging efficacy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.  The overall toxicity profile is comparable to other BCMA-targeting BsAbs. The low grade of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) supports the administration of elranatamab in the outpatient setting. High infection rates remain a challenge, although further refinement of anti-infection prophylaxis and adjustment of the dosing schedule may reduce the risk.  Clinical trials are currently investigating elranatamab in different settings to further enhance the efficacy, including as a first-line treatment and combination regimens, although benefits need to be weighed against the increased toxicity risk.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2419</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an online mindfulness program (MindOnLine) to reduce fear of recurrence among people with cancer: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2401</link>
      <description>Title: Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an online mindfulness program (MindOnLine) to reduce fear of recurrence among people with cancer: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Epworth Authors: Wootten, Addie; Gillan, Kate
Abstract: Introduction: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a common condition among cancer survivors that can lead to significant levels of distress, anxiety and depression. Online mindfulness programmes may provide the mechanism to support cancer survivors manage FCR and distress, and improve people’s well-being over the short, medium and long term. The primary aim of this study is to determine the potential efficacy of MindOnLine, a 9 session mindfulness-based programme for survivors of breast, prostate and colorectal cancer. A formal economic programme will also be conducted.&#xD;
&#xD;
Methods and analysis: A single-blind randomised controlled trial to determine the efficacy and cost-efficacy of a MindOnLine programme for cancer survivors. A total of 400 people living with cancer will be recruited via online advertisements on social media platforms, peak consumer advocacy groups or through outpatient services at healthcare providers across Victoria, Australia. People will be randomly allocated to either the MindOnLine programme (n=200) or waitlist control (n=200). Participant assessments will occur at baseline, at 9 weeks and 9-month follow-up. The primary outcome is change in Fear of Recurrence Index Score total score between baseline and 9 weeks; secondary outcomes are changes in depression and anxiety, quality of life and mindfulness. The economic analysis comprises a cost-consequences analysis where all outcomes will be compared with costs.&#xD;
&#xD;
Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval was obtained from the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (20-53) and Deakin University (2020-284). All participants will be required to provide written informed consent. Findings will be disseminated in peer reviewed journals and among key stakeholder organisations including hospitals, cancer and community organisations and Government. If successful the project will be rolled out nationally with a formal implementation plan.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2401</guid>
      <dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

