Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11434/385
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Patel, Minoo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Knox, David | - |
dc.contributor.other | Ackland, David | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-09-17T06:14:50Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-09-17T06:14:50Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-07 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Jul 2;10:101. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1749-799X | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11434/385 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The management of irreparable rotator cuff tears associated with osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint has long been challenging. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) was designed to provide pain relief and improve shoulder function in patients with severe rotator cuff tear arthropathy. While this procedure has been known to reduce pain, improve strength and increase range of motion in shoulder elevation, scapular notching, rotation deficiency, early implant loosening and dislocation have attributed to complication rates as high as 62 %. Patient selection, surgical approach and post-operative management are factors vital to successful outcome of RSA, with implant design and component positioning having a significant influence on the ability of the shoulder muscles to elevate, axially rotate and stabilise the humerus. Clinical and biomechanical studies have revealed that component design and placement affects the location of the joint centre of rotation and therefore the force-generating capacity of the muscles and overall joint mobility and stability. Furthermore, surgical technique has also been shown to have an important influence on clinical outcome of RSA, as it can affect intra-operative joint exposure as well as post-operative muscle function. This review discusses the behaviour of the shoulder after RSA and the influence of implant design, component positioning and surgical technique on post-operative joint function and clinical outcome. | en_US |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central | en_US |
dc.subject | Rotator Cuff Tears | en_US |
dc.subject | Osteoarthritis | en_US |
dc.subject | Glenohumeral Joint | en_US |
dc.subject | Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty | en_US |
dc.subject | RSA | en_US |
dc.subject | Shoulder Function | en_US |
dc.subject | Shoulder Pain | en_US |
dc.subject | Strength | en_US |
dc.subject | Range of Motion | en_US |
dc.subject | Shoulder Elevation | en_US |
dc.subject | Prosthesis | en_US |
dc.subject | Biomechanics | en_US |
dc.subject | Surgery | en_US |
dc.subject | Deltoid | en_US |
dc.subject | Complications | en_US |
dc.subject | Surgical Technique | en_US |
dc.subject | Intra-Operative Joint Exposure | en_US |
dc.subject | Post-Operative Muscle Function | en_US |
dc.subject | Implant Design | en_US |
dc.subject | Component Positioning | en_US |
dc.subject | Musculoskeletal Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia | - |
dc.subject | Orthopaedic Surgery, Epworth Healthcare, Victoria, Australia | - |
dc.title | Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s13018-015-0244-2. | en_US |
dc.identifier.journaltitle | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | en_US |
dc.description.pubmeduri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26135298 | en_US |
dc.description.affiliates | Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia | en_US |
dc.type.studyortrial | Review | en_US |
dc.type.contenttype | Text | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Annual Reports Musculoskeletal |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Prosthesis design and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.pdf | 1.63 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.