Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1280
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWhitehead, Timothy-
dc.contributor.otherPerraton, Luke-
dc.contributor.otherHall, Michelle-
dc.contributor.otherCrossley, Kay-
dc.contributor.otherYong-Hao, Pua-
dc.contributor.otherMorris, Hayden-
dc.contributor.otherCulvenor, Adam-
dc.contributor.otherBryant, Adam-
dc.contributor.otherClark, Ross-
dc.date2017-11-
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-01T23:51:18Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-01T23:51:18Z-
dc.date.issued2018-02-
dc.identifier.citationKnee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Feb; 26(2): 391-398en_US
dc.identifier.issn0942-2056en_US
dc.identifier.issn1433-7347en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/1280-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Poor knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may increase the risk of future knee symptoms and knee osteoarthritis via abnormal knee joint loading patterns, particularly during high-impact activity. This study aimed to assess the relationship between poor self-reported or clinically measured knee function and knee moments/vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) in individuals following ACLR. METHODS: 61 participants (mean 16.5 ± 3 months following ACLR, 23 women) completed a patient-reported knee function questionnaire and three hop tests (% of uninvolved limb). Participants were divided into satisfactory and poor knee function groups (poor < 85% patient-reported knee function and/or < 85% hop test symmetry). The knee biomechanics of both groups were assessed with three-dimensional motion analysis during the stance phase of overland running at self-selected speeds, and the association between knee function and knee moments was assessed using analysis of covariance with running speed as a covariate. RESULTS: Participants with poor knee function (n = 30) ran with significantly smaller peak knee flexion moments (moderate effect size 0.7, p = 0.03) and significantly smaller peak vGRFs (large effect size 1.0, p = 0.002) compared to those with satisfactory knee function (n = 31). No significant differences were observed for knee adduction and knee external rotation moments or knee kinematics. CONCLUSION: Individuals following ACLR with poor self-reported knee function and/or hop test performance demonstrate knee moments during running that may be associated with lower knee joint contact forces. These findings provide greater understanding of the relationship between knee biomechanics during running and clinical assessments of knee function.en_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.subjectAnterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructionen_US
dc.subjectACLRen_US
dc.subjectBiomechanicsen_US
dc.subjectHop Testsen_US
dc.subjectPatient-Reported Knee Functionen_US
dc.subjectVertical Ground Reaction Forceen_US
dc.subjectvGRFen_US
dc.subjectKnee Function Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectRunningen_US
dc.subjectLanding Forceen_US
dc.subjectKnee Flexionen_US
dc.subjectKnee Joint Loading Patternsen_US
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titlePoor knee function after ACL reconstruction is associated with attenuated landing force and knee flexion moment during running.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00167-017-4810-5en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopyen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29185004en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Primary Health Care, Monash University, Building B, McMahons Road, Peninsula campus, Frankston, VIC, 3199, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesMelbourne School of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesSchool of Health and Sport Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesSchool of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Physiotherapy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singaporeen_US
dc.description.affiliatesInstitute of Anatomy Salzburg and Nuremburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austriaen_US
dc.type.studyortrialComparative Studyen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Musculoskeletal

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.