Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1134
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBloomer, Melissa-
dc.contributor.authorBotti, Mari-
dc.contributor.authorHutchinson, Ana-
dc.contributor.otherBarnfield, J.-
dc.contributor.otherPoon, P.-
dc.contributor.otherRunacres, F.-
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-13T06:28:19Z-
dc.date.available2017-06-13T06:28:19Z-
dc.date.issued2017-06-
dc.identifier.citationEpworth Research Institute Research Week 2017; Poster 2: pp 25en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/1134-
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Despite the goals of sub-acute care to optimise patient functioning, many older patients will die in sub-acute care. METHOD: Conducted in an 183-bed sub-acute facility in metropolitan Melbourne, an audit was undertaken of 55 inpatient deaths from July 2015-June 2016. Patient demographics, diagnosis, care goals, care transitions and end of life care management data were collected. All clinician written entries related to the timing, nature and content of communication with next-of-kin; and entries related to care provision and decisions were collected. RESULTS: Numeric data were analysed descriptively. Of the 55 inpatient deaths, 55% were male, and 64% were aged 80 or over. 'Falls', 'Diseases of the circulatory system' and 'Problems related to life-management difficulty' were the top three reasons for admission. 43% also had comorbid diagnosis of cognitive impairment. Almost 48% of patients were admitted for 'Assessment', and 39% to 'Establish a safe discharge destination'. One patient was admitted for management of end-stage disease. Content analysis of the written entries of the multidisciplinary treatment team revealed that when dying patients were able to state their preference for end of life care, care goals were openly communicated and care was more coordinated. In all other cases, the use of vague or evasive language was found to impact communication between clinicians contributing to delays in care processes and decisions; also impacting next-of-kin's understanding and acceptance that the patient was dying. Cultural differences were not consistently accommodated, further compounding end of life care. CONCLUSION: Further work is needed to promote earlier acknowledgement and communication when a patient admitted to sub-acute care is dying rather than requiring rehabilitation; allowing for care plans and processes to be amended accordingly.en_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectSub-Acute Careen_US
dc.subjectEnd of Life Careen_US
dc.subjectCare Plansen_US
dc.subjectInpatient Deathsen_US
dc.subjectRehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectFamily Communicationen_US
dc.subjectPatient Demographicsen_US
dc.subjectCare Provisionen_US
dc.subjectFallsen_US
dc.subjectDiseases of the Circulatory Systemen_US
dc.subjectLife Management Difficultyen_US
dc.subjectComorbidityen_US
dc.subjectCare Transitionsen_US
dc.subjectMultidisciplinary Teamen_US
dc.subjectMDTen_US
dc.subjectCentre for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Epworth HealthCare Partnershipen_US
dc.subjectEpworth/Deakin Centre for Clinical Nursing Research, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.titleEnd of life care challenges for older people in sub-acute care.en_US
dc.typeConference Posteren_US
dc.description.affiliatesDeakin University, Geelongen_US
dc.description.affiliatesCenter for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Epworth HealthCare Partnershipen_US
dc.description.affiliatesCenter for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Monash Health Partnershipen_US
dc.description.affiliatesMonash Healthen_US
dc.type.studyortrialObservational Studyen_US
dc.description.conferencenameEpworth Research Institute Research Week 2017en_US
dc.description.conferencelocationEpworth Research Institute, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Rehabilitation
Research Month

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.