Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1163
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKahn, Michelle-
dc.contributor.authorMentiplay, Benjamin-
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Gavin-
dc.contributor.authorOlver, John-
dc.contributor.authorBanky, Megan-
dc.contributor.otherBower, Kelly-
dc.contributor.otherClark, Ross-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-19T02:35:23Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-19T02:35:23Z-
dc.date.issued2017-06-
dc.identifier.citationEpworth Research Institute Research Week 2017; Poster 18: pp 41en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/1163-
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Three-dimensional motion analysis is the criterion-reference for evaluation of movement kinematics. Whilst, Optitrack is a new, more user-friendly system comprehensive gait and upper limb kinematic assessment is still costly, time-consuming and requires specialist training, limiting its routine clinical use. The Microsoft Kinect is a low-cost, three-dimensional, depth-sensing camera, originally developed for the Xbox. It is portable and cheap with reduced set-up and analysis burden. AIM: To establish the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the Kinect compared to three-dimensional motion analysis for quantifying upper and lower limb kinematics during gait in people with acquired brain injury. DESIGN: Observational study. METHODS: Twenty people with chronic acquired brain injury with gait abnormalities and upper limb associated reactions were recruited. All participants underwent gait analysis with an Optitrack three-dimensional motion analysis system and the Kinect on two testing occasions, one-week apart. Four trials at self-selected walking speed were recorded. mean, standard deviation, maximum, minimum and total joint range of motion were captured for the upper and lower limb joint axes. Correlation coefficients reported the association between the two systems for concurrent validity and between sessions for the Microsoft Kinect's test-retest reliability. RESULTS: The Kinect displayed excellent concurrent validity (r > 0.7) to the Optitrack for shoulder flexion range of motion, shoulder abduction mean and maximum, elbow flexion maximum, hip flexion maximum and all measures of knee flexion for the affected limbs. The Kinect displayed excellent test-retest reliability (r > 0.8) for all upper and lower limb joint axes. CONCLUSION: - The Kinect displays promising concurrent validity to three-dimensional motion analysis for key kinematic variables for upper limb associated reactions. - The Kinect is highly reliable. - The Kinect may provide a valuable clinical tool to simply and objectively measure gait. - Investigation into the Kinect's responsiveness is warranted. - The Kinect is unable to capture forearm, wrist and ankle joint data.en_US
dc.subjectUpper and Lower Limb Kinematicsen_US
dc.subjectComprehensive Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectMicrosoft Kinectsen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectValidityen_US
dc.subjectAcquired Brain Injuryen_US
dc.subjectABIen_US
dc.subjectThree-Dimensional Motion Analysisen_US
dc.subjectMovement Evaluationen_US
dc.subjectOptitracken_US
dc.subjectTest-Retest Reliabilityen_US
dc.subjectConcurrent Validityen_US
dc.subjectGait Abnormalitiesen_US
dc.subjectUpper Limb Associated Reactionsen_US
dc.subjectGait Analysisen_US
dc.subjectMeanen_US
dc.subjectStandard Deviationen_US
dc.subjectMaximumen_US
dc.subjectMinimumen_US
dc.subjectTotal Joint Range of Motionen_US
dc.subjectClinical Toolen_US
dc.subjectDepartment of Physiotherapy , Epworth Healthcare , Victoria , Australiaen_US
dc.subjectRehabilitation, Mental Health and Chronic Pain Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.subjectNeurosciences Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titleAssessment of upper and lower limb kinematics using the low-cost Microsoft Kinect: reliability and validity in people with acquired brain injury.en_US
dc.typeConference Posteren_US
dc.description.affiliatesUSC Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesThe University of Melbourneen_US
dc.description.affiliatesMonash Universityen_US
dc.type.studyortrialObservational Studyen_US
dc.description.conferencenameEpworth Research Institute Research Week 2017en_US
dc.description.conferencelocationEpworth Research Institute, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Neurosciences
Research Week

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.