Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1195
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorThayaparan, Ganesha-
dc.contributor.authorD'Urso, Paul-
dc.contributor.otherLewis, Philip-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-08T04:02:14Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-08T04:02:14Z-
dc.date.issued2017-06-
dc.identifier.citationEpworth Research Institute Research Week 2017; Poster 45: pp 69en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/1195-
dc.description.abstractPre-surgical planning using 3D printed anatomical models enables the preparation of a "patient-specific" kit for instumented spinal fusion surgery. This approach has the potential to decrease operating time, while also offering logistical benefits and thus cost savings for the hospital. We report our experience with this method in 73 consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) over a 12-month period at a single centre and performed by a single surgeon. Using patient imaging and custom surgical planning software, a patient-specific MIS TLIF kit was manufactured for each case to include a custom pedicle screw guide, and 3D printed self-guided dilators and tubular retractors. The required pedicle screws, rods, and cages were separately supplied and packaged together with the patient specific kits. Additional implants were available on shelf in case of a size discrepancy between the kit implant and intraoperative measurements. Each patient's spinal model was also included for use in both surgical planning and patient education. Efficiency metrics were recorded as average theatre time (164 min), the number of sterile trays required per case (14), mean X-ray dose (1359 cGycm2), number of operative waste bags (0.8 contaminated, one uncontaminated bags), and the average length of hospital stay (5.4 days). The kit implants were deemed appropriate for 394/403 pedicle screws over 129 levels, 137/146 rods, and 19/90 cages. Pedicle screw placement was independently verified as accurate by postoperative CT in 403/403 cases. Across all 73 patient admissions, there was one intraoperative complication (dual tear), no autologous blood transfusions or blood products were administered, and no revision surgery. Our experience supports a viable application of patient-specific customs solutions in spine surgery.en_US
dc.subjectTransforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusionen_US
dc.subjectMIS TLIFen_US
dc.subjectPre-Surgical Planningen_US
dc.subject3D Printed Anatomical Modelsen_US
dc.subjectInstrumented Spinal Fusion Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectCustom Pedicle Screw Guideen_US
dc.subjectPedicle Screwsen_US
dc.subjectSelf-Guided Dilatorsen_US
dc.subjectTubular Retractorsen_US
dc.subjectPatient-Specific Kitsen_US
dc.subjectIntraoperative Measurementsen_US
dc.subjectSpine Modelen_US
dc.subjectPatient Educationen_US
dc.subjectEfficiency Metricsen_US
dc.subjectAverage Theatre Timeen_US
dc.subjectSterile Trays Requireden_US
dc.subjectMean X-Ray Doseen_US
dc.subjectOperative Waste Bagsen_US
dc.subjectLength of Stayen_US
dc.subjectNeurosciences Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titleCustom solutions for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery.en_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.type.studyortrialCohort Studyen_US
dc.description.conferencenameEpworth Research Institute Research Week 2017en_US
dc.description.conferencelocationEpworth Research Institute, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Musculoskeletal
Neurosciences
Research Week

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.