Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1206
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSinclair, Rodney-
dc.contributor.otherReich, Kristian-
dc.contributor.otherPapp, Kim-
dc.contributor.otherBlauvelt, Andrew-
dc.contributor.otherTyring, Stephen-
dc.contributor.otherThaçi, Diamant-
dc.contributor.otherNograles, Kristine-
dc.contributor.otherMehta, Anish-
dc.contributor.otherCichanowitz, Nicole-
dc.contributor.otherLi, Qing-
dc.contributor.otherLiu, Kenneth-
dc.contributor.otherLa Rosa, Carmen-
dc.contributor.otherGreen, Stuart-
dc.contributor.otherKimball, Alexa-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-09T02:29:28Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-09T02:29:28Z-
dc.date.issued2017-07-
dc.identifier.citationLancet. 2017 Jul 15;390(10091):276-288en_US
dc.identifier.issn0140-6736en_US
dc.identifier.issn1474-547Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/1206-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Tildrakizumab is a high-affinity, humanised, IgG1 κ antibody targeting interleukin 23 p19 that represents an evolving treatment strategy in chronic plaque psoriasis. Previous research suggested clinical improvement with inhibition of interleukin 23 p19. We did two phase 3 trials to investigate whether tildrakizumab is superior to placebo and etanercept in the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. METHODS: We did two three-part, parallel group, double-blind, randomised controlled studies, reSURFACE 1 (at 118 sites in Australia, Canada, Japan, the UK, and the USA) and reSURFACE 2 (at 132 sites in Europe, Israel, and the USA). Participants aged 18 years or older with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis (body surface area involvement ≥10%, Physician's Global Assessment [PGA] score ≥3, and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] score ≥12) were randomised (via interactive voice and web response system) to tildrakizumab 200 mg, tildrakizumab 100 mg, or placebo in reSURFACE 1 (2:2:1), or to tildrakizumab 200 mg, tildrakizumab 100 mg, placebo, or etanercept 50 mg (2:2:1:2). Randomisation was done by region and stratified for bodyweight (≤90 kg or >90 kg) and previous exposure to biologics therapy for psoriasis. Investigators, participants, and study personnel were blinded to group allocation and remained blinded until completion of the studies. Assigned medication was identical in appearance and packaging. Tildrakizumab was administered subcutaneously at weeks 0 and 4 during part 1 and at week 16 during part 2 (weeks 12 and 16 for participants re-randomised from placebo to tildrakizumab; etanercept was given twice weekly in part 1 of reSURFACE 2 and once weekly during part 2). The co-primary endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving PASI 75 and PGA response (score of 0 or 1 with ≥2 grade score reduction from baseline) at week 12. Safety was assessed in the all-participants-as-treated population, and efficacy in the full-analysis set. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT01722331 (reSURFACE 1) and NCT01729754 (reSURFACE 2). These studies are completed, but extension studies are ongoing. FINDINGS: reSURFACE 1 ran from Dec 10, 2012, to Oct 28, 2015. reSURFACE 2 ran from Feb 12, 2013, to Sept 28, 2015. In reSURFACE 1, 772 patients were randomly assigned, 308 to tildrakizumab 200 mg, 309 to tildrakizumab 100 mg, and 155 to placebo. At week 12, 192 patients (62%) in the 200 mg group and 197 patients (64%) in the 100 mg group achieved PASI 75, compared with 9 patients (6%) in the placebo group (p<0·0001 for comparisons of both tildrakizumab groups vs placebo). 182 patients (59%) in the 200 mg group and 179 patients (58%) in the 100 mg group achieved PGA responses, compared with 11 patients (7%) in the placebo group (p<0·0001 for comparisons of both tildrakizumab groups vs placebo). In reSURFACE 2, 1090 patients were randomly assigned, 314 to tildrakizumab 200 mg, 307 to tildrakizumab 100 mg, 156 to placebo, and 313 to etanercept. At week 12, 206 patients (66%) in the 200 mg group, and 188 patients (61%) in the 100 mg group achieved PASI 75, compared with 9 patients (6%) in the placebo group and 151 patients (48%) in the etanercept group (p<0·0001 for comparisons of both tildrakizumab groups vs placebo; p<0·0001 for 200 mg vs etanercept and p=0·0010 for 100 mg vs etanercept). 186 patients (59%) in the 200 mg group, and 168 patients (59%) [corrected] in the 100 mg group achieved a PGA response, compared with 7 patients (4%) in the placebo group and 149 patients (48%) in the etanercept group (p<0·0001 for comparisons of both tildrakizumab groups vs placebo; p=0·0031 for 200 mg vs etanercept and p=0·0663 for 100 mg vs etanercept). Serious adverse events were similar and low in all groups in both trials. One patient died in reSURFACE 2, in the tildrakizumab 100 mg group; the patient had alcoholic cardiomyopathy and steatohepatitis, and adjudication was unable to determine the cause of death. INTERPRETATION: In two phase 3 trials, tildrakizumab 200 mg and 100 mg were efficacious compared with placebo and etanercept and were well tolerated in the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. FUNDING: Merck & Co.en_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectTildrakizumaben_US
dc.subjectChronic Plaque Psoriasisen_US
dc.subjectIgG1 κ Antibodyen_US
dc.subjectInterleukin 23 p19en_US
dc.subjectClinical Improvementen_US
dc.subjectEtanercepten_US
dc.subjectreSURFACE 1en_US
dc.subjectreSURFACE 2en_US
dc.subjectPhysician's Global Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectPGAen_US
dc.subjectPsoriasis Area and Severity Indexen_US
dc.subjectPASIen_US
dc.subjectBiologics Therapyen_US
dc.subjectPsoriasisen_US
dc.subjectSubcutaneous Drug Administrationen_US
dc.subjectSafety Analysesen_US
dc.subjectEfficacy Analysesen_US
dc.subjectComparisonsen_US
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomesen_US
dc.subjectChair of Dermatology, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.subjectHead & Neck Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titleTildrakizumab versus placebo or etanercept for chronic plaque psoriasis (reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2): results from two randomised controlled, phase 3 trials.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31279-5en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleThe Lanceten_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28596043en_US
dc.description.affiliatesSCIderm Research Institute and Dermatologikum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germanyen_US
dc.description.affiliatesProbity Medical Research, Waterloo, ON, Canadaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesOregon Medical Research Center, Portland, OR, USAen_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Dermatology, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USAen_US
dc.description.affiliatesComprehensive Center for Inflammation Medicine, University Medical School Schleswig-Holstein, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germanyen_US
dc.description.affiliatesHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USAen_US
dc.type.studyortrialRandomized Controlled Clinical Trialen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Dermatology
Head & Neck
Research Week

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.