Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1216
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorde Steiger, Richard-
dc.contributor.otherShah, Siddharth-
dc.contributor.otherWalter, William-
dc.contributor.otherTai, Stephen-
dc.contributor.otherLorimer, Michelle-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-06T02:50:39Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-06T02:50:39Z-
dc.date.issued2017-09-
dc.identifier.citationJ Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2852-2856en_US
dc.identifier.issn0883-5403en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/1216-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Dislocation is a leading cause of revision after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although more common in the first few years after the procedure, dislocation can occur at any time. This study investigated the difference in late dislocation in ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings compared with metal-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings in THA. METHODS: Data were used from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, and the cumulative percent revision for dislocation was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for the different bearing surfaces. There were 192,275 THAs included in the study with 101,915 metal-on-cross-linked polyethylene (MoXLPE), 30,256 ceramic-on-cross-linked polyethylene (CoXLPE), and 60,104 CoC. RESULTS: The cumulative percent revision for dislocation at 13 years for MoXLPE, CoXLPE, and CoC groups was 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.3), 1.0 (95% CI, 0.7-1.4), and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.8-1.1), respectively. There was an increased risk of revision for dislocation for MoXLPE compared with CoXLPE and CoC. When stratified for head size, there was no difference in the risk of revision for dislocation between MoXLPE, CoXLPE, and CoC in the 28- and 32-mm head sizes. With a head size of 36 mm, MoXLPE had a higher rate of dislocation compared with other materials. CONCLUSION: Bearing surface has little impact on revision for dislocation.en_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectCeramic-On-Ceramicen_US
dc.subjectCoCen_US
dc.subjectBearing Surfaceen_US
dc.subjectCross-Linked Polyethyleneen_US
dc.subjectCoXLPEen_US
dc.subjectMetal-On-Cross-Linked Polyethyleneen_US
dc.subjectMoXLPEen_US
dc.subjectLate Dislocationen_US
dc.subjectTotal Hip Arthroplastyen_US
dc.subjectTHAen_US
dc.subjectKaplan-Meier Methoden_US
dc.subjectDislocationen_US
dc.subjectAustralian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registryen_US
dc.subjectDepartment of Surgery, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titleLate dislocations after total hip arthroplasty: is the bearing a factor?en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.037en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleThe Journal of Arthroplastyen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28529109en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Clinical Research, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesAustralian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.en_US
dc.type.studyortrialComparative Studyen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Musculoskeletal

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.