Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1440
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcKenzie, Dean-
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Martin-
dc.contributor.otherRudock, G.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-18T03:04:38Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-18T03:04:38Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/1440-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Frozen shoulder and shoulder stiffness are two potential complications following shoulder surgery. These present during an until then normal rehabilitation period and can have a profound effect on patient quality of life. This retrospective file audit is a pilot study examining incidence, prognostic factors, and effective managements. This is yet to be investigated in Australia and the results will form the basis for a larger project in the future. Method: 129 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery or mini-open rotator cuff repair from July 2015 to July 2017 were included in this study. 25 patients underwent capsular release for primary frozen shoulder and were considered a separate group. Patient demographics, operation details, and details of follow up were collected from patient files. Results: 43/104 (41.3%, 95% CI = 31.8 to 51.4%) patients experienced postoperative stiffness following arthroscopic surgery. Follow-up for stiff patients had a median of 6 months (95% CI = 4.8 to 7.2 months) while non-stiff patients were followed up for a median of 3 months (95% CI = 2.0 to 4.0 months), this difference being statistically significant (p < 0.001) according to median quantile regression. 24 patients underwent hydrodilatation for their stiffness, 4 underwent capsular release. 15/25 (60.0%, 38.7% to 78.9%) patients undergoing capsular release experienced postoperative stiffness. Conclusion: Postoperative frozen shoulder is a prevalent complication of arthroscopic surgery with an incidence of 41%. The majority of patients underwent hydrodilatation for treatment. Stiff patients required follow-up for twice as long as their non-stiff counterparts.en_US
dc.subjectFrozen Shoulderen_US
dc.subjectShoulder Stiffnessen_US
dc.subjectPost-Operative Complicationsen_US
dc.subjectShoulder Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectRehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectQuality of Lifeen_US
dc.subjectQoLen_US
dc.subjectIncidenceen_US
dc.subjectPrognastic Factorsen_US
dc.subjectEffective Managementsen_US
dc.subjectArthroscopic Shoulder Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectMini-Open Rotator Cuff Repairen_US
dc.subjectCapsular Releaseen_US
dc.subjectPost-Operative Stiffnessen_US
dc.subjectHydrodilationen_US
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titleRisk, incidence, and outcomes of postoperative frozen shoulder.en_US
dc.typeConference Posteren_US
dc.description.affiliatesUniversity of Melbourneen_US
dc.type.studyortrialRetrospective studiesen_US
dc.description.conferencenameEpworth HealthCare Research Week 2018en_US
dc.description.conferencelocationEpworth Research Institute, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Musculoskeletal
Research Week

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.