Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1452
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorValoppi, Glenn-
dc.contributor.authorPeel, Trisha-
dc.contributor.authorTeh, Benjamin-
dc.contributor.authorDoyle, Joseph-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-27T02:39:02Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-27T02:39:02Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/1452-
dc.description.abstractEpworth Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) participated in the 2017 National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (NAPS). This point-prevalence survey, administered by the National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, assesses the prevalence and appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing in Australian hospitals. The charts of 456 overnight patients, across 30 wards at all acute divisions (excluding Geelong), were reviewed to identify antimicrobial prescriptions. All prescriptions valid at 08:00, or surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) administered within the preceding 24 hours were recorded. The drug, dose, route, duration, and indication for therapy, plus relevant microbiology or biochemistry results were recorded. Prescriptions were assessed for compliance with Therapeutic Guidelines, or Epworth SAP Guidelines; and also appropriateness, recognising limitations of guidelines. 45% patients were prescribed ≥1 antimicrobial. 296 prescriptions were assessed. 67.2% prescriptions were assessed as appropriate, 29.4% as inappropriate, 3.4% could not be assessed. Appropriateness was poorer than the national benchmark and the 2016 Epworth result (both 74.6%). Prescribing appropriateness at Epworth has improved compared to pre-implementation of the AMS program (52% in 2012). SAP represented 36.5% of all prescriptions, but 73.6% of inappropriate prescriptions. 40.7% of SAP prescriptions were assessed as appropriate, down from 46.5% in 2016. The most frequent reasons to deem SAP as inappropriate were: incorrect duration (48.1%), and incorrect dose or frequency (28.7%). SAP continued for >24 hours post-operatively for 50.9% of prescriptions. A SAP-specific NAPS conducted at Epworth in 2017, also capturing procedures for which no antimicrobials were prescribed, and day cases, found higher rates of prescribing appropriateness peri-operatively (60%), and post-operatively (74.7%).en_US
dc.subjectEpworth Antimicrobial Stewardshipen_US
dc.subjectAMSen_US
dc.subjectNational Antimicrobial Prescribing Surveyen_US
dc.subjectNAPSen_US
dc.subjectNational Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardshipen_US
dc.subjectAntimicrobial Prescription, Appropriatenessen_US
dc.subjectAntimicrobial Prescription, Prevalenceen_US
dc.subjectSurgical Antibiotic Prophylaxisen_US
dc.subjectSAPen_US
dc.subjectMicrobiologyen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistryen_US
dc.subjectPrescriptions Complianceen_US
dc.subjectTherapeutic Guidelinesen_US
dc.subjectInternal Medicine Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titleEpworth: National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (NAPS) 2017.en_US
dc.typeConference Posteren_US
dc.type.studyortrialSurveyen_US
dc.description.conferencenameEpworth HealthCare Research Week 2018en_US
dc.description.conferencelocationEpworth Research Institute, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Internal Medicine
Research Week

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.