Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/152
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrazenor, Graemeen
dc.contributor.authorBallok, Zitaen
dc.contributor.authorMalham, Gregoryen
dc.date2014-05-02en
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-22T01:54:31Zen
dc.date.available2015-05-22T01:54:31Zen
dc.date.issued2014-09en
dc.identifier.citation2014 Sep;21(9):1617-21en
dc.identifier.issn0967-5868en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/152en
dc.description.abstractImage fusion software enables technetium(99m)-methylene diphosphonate (Tc(99m)-MDP) bone scan images to be co-registered with CT scan or MRI, allowing greater anatomical discrimination. We examined the role of bone scan images co-registered with CT scan or MRI in the investigation of patients presenting with axial spinal pain and/or limb pain. One hundred and thirty-nine consecutive patients were examined, and thereafter investigated with CT scan, MRI, and/or dynamic plain films. At this point diagnosis (pathology type and anatomical site) and treatment intention were declared. The co-registered Tc(99m)-MDP bone scan images were then studied, after which diagnosis (pathology type and anatomical site) and treatment intention were re-declared. This data were then analysed to determine whether the addition of co-registered bone scan images resulted in any change in diagnosis or treatment intention. The most significant change in diagnosis was pathology type (10%). Anatomical site changed markedly without overlap of the pre and post-isotope fields in 5%, and with overlap in 10%. Treatment intention had a major change in 3.6% and minor change in 8.6%. In the two groups where there was (i) no obvious pathology after full pre-isotope investigation, or (ii) a spinal fusion under suspicion, addition of the bone scan information led to a major change in the pathology and/or anatomical localisation in 18% and 19%, respectively. The addition of co-registered Tc(99m)-MDP bone scan images offers significant diagnostic assistance, particularly in the difficult diagnostic groups where a failed spinal fusion may be the suspected pain generator, or when no pain generator can otherwise be found.en
dc.subjectBone scanen
dc.subjectCT scanen
dc.subjectDiagnosisen
dc.subjectMRen
dc.subjectPathologyen
dc.subjectSpineen
dc.subjectTreatmenten
dc.subjectNeurosciences Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.titleCo-registration of isotope bone scan with CT scan and MRI in the investigation of spinal pathology.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jocn.2013.11.034en
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Clinical Neuroscienceen
dc.description.pubmedurihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24798908en
dc.description.affiliatesSpine Society of Australiaen
dc.description.affiliatesNeurosurgical Society of Australiaen
dc.type.studyortrialCohort Studyen
dc.type.contenttypeTexten
Appears in Collections:Diagnostic Services
Neurosciences

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.