Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/153
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWillmott, Catherineen
dc.contributor.authorPonsford, Jennieen
dc.contributor.otherWithiel, Tonien
dc.contributor.otherBurke, Richarden
dc.date2014-07-08en
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-22T03:22:35Zen
dc.date.available2015-05-22T03:22:35Zen
dc.date.issued2014-09en
dc.identifier.citation2014 Sep 1;31(17):1507-14en
dc.identifier.issn0897-7151en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/153en
dc.description.abstractThere is significant variability in long-term outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI), making accurate prognosis difficult. In seeking to enhance understanding of outcomes, this study aimed to investigate whether COMT Val(158)Met allele status was associated with performance on neuropsychological measures of attention and working memory, executive functioning, learning and memory, and speed of information processing in the early rehabilitation phase. The study also aimed to examine whether the COMT polymorphism was associated with longer-term functional outcomes. A total of 223 participants (71.3% male) with moderate-to-severe TBI were recruited as rehabilitation inpatients to participate in a prospective, longitudinal head injury outcome study. The three COMT genotype groups (Val/Val, Val/Met, and Met/Met) were well matched for estimated full-scale IQ, years of education, age at injury, and injury severity. Results showed no significant difference between genotypes on neuropsychological measures (all p>0.05) or functional outcome, as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E), after controlling for age, education, and severity of injury. The presence of frontal lobe pathology was also not associated with cognitive performance. Those with greater injury severity (i.e., longer duration of post-traumatic amnesia) performed more poorly on measures of processing speed and verbal new learning and recall. It was concluded that there was little support for the influence of COMT Val(158)Met on cognitive function, or functional outcome measures, in the acute rehabilitation phase after TBI.en
dc.subjectCOMT Val158Meten
dc.subjectCognitionen
dc.subjectGeneticsen
dc.subjectOutcomesen
dc.subjectTraumatic Brain Injuryen
dc.subjectMonash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.en
dc.subjectTBIen
dc.titleCOMT Val158Met and cognitive and functional outcomes after traumatic brain injury.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/neu.2013.3308en
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Neurotraumaen
dc.description.pubmedurihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24786534en
dc.description.affiliatesSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.en
dc.description.affiliatesSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.en
dc.type.studyortrialCohort Studyen
dc.type.contenttypeTexten
Appears in Collections:Neurosciences

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.