Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/171
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcKay, Adamen
dc.contributor.authorWong, Danaen
dc.contributor.otherStolwyk, Renerusen
dc.contributor.otherO'Neill, Meganen
dc.date2014-07-29en
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-03T00:02:03Zen
dc.date.available2015-06-03T00:02:03Zen
dc.date.issued2014-10en
dc.identifier.citation2014 Oct; 45 (10): 3129-34en
dc.identifier.issnp 0039-2499en
dc.identifier.issne 1524-4628en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/171en
dc.descriptionCognitive screening measures were included if they were designed to screen for cognitive impairment or had been used for that purpose.en
dc.description.abstractAbstract not available.en
dc.subjectStrokeen
dc.subjectReview Literatureen
dc.subjectCognitionen
dc.subjectNeuropsychologyen
dc.subjectSensitivity and specificityen
dc.subjectReview, Systematicen
dc.subjectReviewen
dc.titleAre cognitive screening tools sensitive and specific enough for use after stroke? A systematic literature review.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004232en
dc.identifier.journaltitleStrokeen
dc.description.pubmedurihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25074518en
dc.description.affiliatesAmerican Heart Associationen
dc.description.affiliatesSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en
dc.description.affiliatesFaculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en
dc.description.affiliatesBrain Injury and Rehabilitation research team, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australiaen
dc.description.affiliatesMonash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre (MERRC)en
dc.type.studyortrialSystematic Reviewsen
dc.type.contenttypeTexten
Appears in Collections:Neurosciences

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.