Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1920
Title: | End-of-life care and intensive care unit clinician involvement in a private acute care hospital: A retrospective descriptive medical record audit. |
Epworth Authors: | Botti, Mari McKenzie, Dean Barrett, Jonathan King, Anthony |
Other Authors: | Bloomer, Melissa |
Keywords: | ICU Intensive Care End of Life Care EoL Palliative Care Australian National Standard Clinician Involvement Demographic Factors Clinical Factors Quality of Care Length of Stay Critical Care Death Decision Making Hospital Rapid Response Team Critical Care Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia |
Issue Date: | Dec-2020 |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Citation: | Aust Crit Care . 2020 Dec 22;S1036-7314(20)30335-0 |
Abstract: | Introduction: More Australians die in the hospital than in any other setting. This study aimed to (i) evaluate the quality of end-of-life (EOL) care in the hospital against an Australian National Standard, (ii) describe the characteristics of intensive care unit (ICU) clinician involvement in EOL care, and (iii) explore the demographic and clinical factors associated with quality of EOL care. Method: A retrospective descriptive medical record audit was conducted on 297 adult inpatients who died in 2017 in a private acute care hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Data collected related to 20 'Processes of Care', considered to contribute to the quality of EOL care. The decedent sample was separated into three cohorts as per ICU clinician involvement. Results: The median age of the sample was 81 (25th-75th percentile = 72-88) years. The median tally for EOL care quality was 16 (25th-75th percentile = 13-17) of 20 care processes. ICU clinicians were involved in 65.7% (n = 195) of cases; however, contact with the ICU outreach team or an ICU admission during the final inpatient stay was negatively associated with quality of EOL care (coefficient = -1.51 and -2.07, respectively). Longer length of stay was positively associated with EOL care (coefficient = .05). Specialist palliative care was involved in 53% of cases, but this was less likely for those admitted to the ICU (p < .001). Evidence of social support, bereavement follow-up, and religious support were low across all cohorts. Conclusion: Statistically significant differences in the quality of EOL care and a negative association between ICU involvement and EOL care quality suggest opportunities for ICU outreach clinicians to facilitate discussion of care goals and the appropriateness of ICU admission. Advocating for inclusion of specialist palliative care and nonclinical support personnel in EOL care has merit. Future research is necessary to investigate the relationship between ICU intervention and EOL care quality. Keywords: Critical care; Death; Decision-making; End-of-life care; Hospital rapid response team; Intensive care units; Palliative care; Quality of care. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11434/1920 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.10.010 |
PubMed URL: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33358274/ |
ISSN: | 1036-7314 |
Journal Title: | Australian Critical Care |
Type: | Journal Article |
Affiliated Organisations: | Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia |
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: | Retrospective studies |
Appears in Collections: | Critical Care |
Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.