Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2044
Title: | Phase 3 study of subcutaneous bortezomib, thalidomide, and prednisolone consolidation after subcutaneous bortezomib-based induction and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: the VCAT study. |
Epworth Authors: | Prince, Miles |
Other Authors: | Horvath, Noemi Spencer, Andrew Kenealy, Melita Joshua, Douglas Campbell, Philip Lee, Je Hou, Jian Qiu, Lugui Kalff, Anna Khong, Tiffany Londhe, Anil Siggins, Sarah van Kooten Losio, Maximiliano Eisbacher, Michael |
Keywords: | Bortezomib-Based Consolidation Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) High-Dose Therapy Subcutaneous Bortezomib TP Consolidation Multiple Myeloma Phase 3 Study Prednisolone Consolidation VCAT Study Epworth Centre for Immunotherapies and Snowdome Laboratories Molecular Oncology and Cancer Immunology Cancer Services Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia |
Issue Date: | Feb-2019 |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis |
Citation: | Leukemia & lymphoma, 60(9), 2122–2133. |
Abstract: | Efficacy and safety of bortezomib-based consolidation following ASCT were investigated in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients from Australia, Korea, and China. Patients received three cycles of bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone induction followed by high-dose therapy/ASCT, then were randomized (1:1) to consolidation with TP (thalidomide 100 mg/d for ≤12 months/until disease progression; prednisolone 50 mg on alternate days indefinitely/until disease progression; n = 100) or VTP (subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 every 2 weeks for 32 weeks, plus TP; n = 103). The hypothesized difference in CR + VGPR rate (after ≤12 months consolidation therapy) was not met. The rate of CR + VGPR was numerically higher with VTP versus TP; however, this was not statistically significant (85.7% versus 77.1%; rate difference 8.6%; 95% confidence interval -2.3%-19.5%; p = .122). Secondary efficacy outcomes were similar between treatment arms. Addition of bortezomib to TP consolidation was associated with limited additional toxicity but did not significantly improve efficacy versus TP. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2044 |
DOI: | 10.1080/10428194.2019.1579322 |
PubMed URL: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30777794/ |
ISSN: | 1042-8194 1029-2403 |
Journal Title: | Leukemia & Lymphoma |
Type: | Journal Article |
Affiliated Organisations: | Department of Haematology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia. Department of Clinical Haematology, Alfred Health-Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Cabrini Health, Australia and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Department of Haematology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Australia; and Sydney University, Sydney, Australia. Department of Haematology, Andrew Love Cancer Centre, Geelong, Australia. Department of Hematology-Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Republic of Korea. Department of Hematology, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China. Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China. Janssen Research & Development LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA. Janssen Cilag, Sydney, Australia. Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. |
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: | Clinical Trial |
Appears in Collections: | Cancer Services MOCI |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.