Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2068
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorde Steiger, Richard-
dc.contributor.otherMulford, Jonathan-
dc.contributor.otherMathew, Ronnie-
dc.contributor.otherPenn, David-
dc.contributor.otherCuthbert, Alana-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-01T02:25:48Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-01T02:25:48Z-
dc.date.issued2022-02-
dc.identifier.citationANZ J Surg . 2022 Feb 21en_US
dc.identifier.issn1445 1433en_US
dc.identifier.issn1445 2197en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/2068-
dc.description.abstractAim: The Anatomique Benoist Girard (ABG) II femoral implant was a commonly used stem for primary total hip replacement (THR) at our institution (Launceston, Tasmania Australia). We identified peri-prosthetic fracture as the main cause of late failure. Methods: The late periprosthetic fracture rate for ABG II implants was reviewed with national statistics, using Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) data. National revision rates for periprosthetic fracture were used to compare ABG II with all other cementless femoral stems. Result: ABG II stems accounted for 1% (2719 implants) of all femoral stem implants in Australia during the 12-year review period, compared to 23% (587 implants) in Launceston Hospitals. Although the Launceston cumulative percent revision rate for the ABG II stem was lower than the National rate at all time points, the reasons for revision were similar. The most common reason for revision of ABG II was fracture (56.8%), followed by loosening (15.3%). This differs from the reasons for revision in other cementless prostheses (loosening 23.9%, fracture 20.8%, dislocation 18.7%). Cumulative percent revision rates from late periprosthetic fracture, were higher for the ABG II stem than other cementless femoral prostheses. Conclusion: This review of the AOANJRR has confirmed a local and national higher revision rate of the ABG II stem due to late periprosthetic fracture compared with other cementless stems. Stem design must be considered to reduce the risk of late periprosthetic fracture.en_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectPeriprosthetic Fractureen_US
dc.subjectFailureen_US
dc.subjectAnatomique Benoist Girard IIen_US
dc.subjectABG IIen_US
dc.subjectFemoral Prosthesisen_US
dc.subjectFemoral Stemen_US
dc.subjectHip Arthroplastyen_US
dc.subjectTotal Hip Replacementen_US
dc.subjectTHRen_US
dc.subjectCementless Stemen_US
dc.subjectAOANJRRen_US
dc.subjectRevision Rateen_US
dc.subjectAustralian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registryen_US
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titlePeriprosthetic fracture as a late mode of failure of the Anatomique Benoist Girard II femoral prosthesis.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ans.17547en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleANZ Journal of Surgeryen_US
dc.description.affiliatesOrthopaedic Department, Department of Surgery, Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesLaunceston Clinical School, School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesAustralian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, South Australia, Australiaen_US
dc.type.studyortrialRetrospective studiesen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Musculoskeletal

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.