Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2093
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMiljevic, Aleksandra-
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Neil-
dc.contributor.authorHerring, Sally-
dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, Paul-
dc.contributor.otherVila-Rodriguez, Fidel-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-29T03:36:45Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-29T03:36:45Z-
dc.date.issued2022-06-
dc.identifier.citationBiol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging . 2022 Jun;7(6):546-554.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2451-9022en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/2093-
dc.description.abstractBrain connectivity can be estimated through many analyses applied to electroencephalography (EEG) data. However, substantial heterogeneity in the implementation of connectivity methods exists. Heterogeneity in conceptualization of connectivity measures, data collection, or data preprocessing may be associated with variability in robustness of measurement. While it is difficult to compare the results of studies using different EEG connectivity measures, standardization of processing and reporting may facilitate the task. We discuss how factors such as referencing, epoch length and number, controls for volume conduction, artifact removal, and statistical control of multiple comparisons influence the EEG connectivity estimate for connectivity measures, and what can be done to control for potential confounds associated with these factors. Based on the results reported in previous literature, this article presents recommendations and a novel checklist developed for quality assessment of EEG connectivity studies. This checklist and its recommendations are made in an effort to draw attention to factors that may influence connectivity estimates and factors that need to be improved in future research. Standardization of procedures and reporting in EEG connectivity may lead to EEG connectivity studies being made more synthesizable and comparable despite variations in the methodology underlying connectivity estimates.en_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectBrain Connectivityen_US
dc.subjectElectroencephalographyen_US
dc.subjectEEG Processingen_US
dc.subjectEEG Analysisen_US
dc.subjectEEG Connectivityen_US
dc.subjectConnectivity Metricsen_US
dc.subjectElectroencephalographyen_US
dc.subjectHeterogenityen_US
dc.subjectRehabilitation, Mental Health and Chronic Pain Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.subjectEpworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Epworth HealthCare, Camberwell, Australiaen_US
dc.titleElectroencephalographic connectivity: a fundamental guide and checklist for optimal study design and evaluation.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.10.017en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleBiological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimagingen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34740847/en_US
dc.description.affiliatesNon-Invasive Neurostimulation Therapies Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canadaen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Mental Health

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.