Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2102
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, Leo-
dc.contributor.authorMiljevic, Aleksandra-
dc.contributor.authorHoy, Kate-
dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, Paul-
dc.contributor.otherThomas, Elizabeth-
dc.contributor.otherKaewpijit, Pakin-
dc.contributor.otherHahn, Lisa-
dc.contributor.otherLavale, Alexandra-
dc.contributor.otherGalletly, Cherrie-
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-11T00:34:52Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-11T00:34:52Z-
dc.date.issued2022-06-
dc.identifier.citationBrain Stimul . 2022 Jun 15;15(4):889-891en_US
dc.identifier.issn1935-861Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/2102-
dc.description.abstractTo the editor, We read with interest recent articles in Brain Stimulation, reporting on the antidepressant effects of theta burst stimulation (TBS) applied in accelerated schedules [1,2] and the efficacy comparison between unilateral and bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) approaches [3]. We recently reported a multisite randomized controlled trial comparing the antidepressant efficacy of accelerated bilateral TBS applied at 80% or 120% of the resting motor threshold (RMT) and left-sided 10 Hz rTMS applied at 120% RMT [4]. The increasing evidence base supporting TBS's antidepressant effects has seen it gain acceptance as an alternative to standard left-sided 10 Hz rTMS in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Little is known whether TRD patients who do not experience antidepressant benefits with a standard course of rTMS might do so with a subsequent course of TBS, or vice-versa. Given that approximately 60–80% of patients who undergo a course of left-sided 10 Hz rTMS can expect to experience depression treatment response [3,5], this is a clinically relevant knowledge gap for which minimal evidence-based guidance exists. One way to address this is to evaluate non-responders’ treatment outcomes to a crossover course of the alternate stimulation protocol. To our knowledge, such a crossover study has not been reported.en_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectLetteren_US
dc.subjectTheta Burst Stimulationen_US
dc.subjectTBSen_US
dc.subjectRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulationen_US
dc.subjectrTMSen_US
dc.subjectAntidepressanten_US
dc.subjectResting Motor Thresholden_US
dc.subjectRMTen_US
dc.subjectEpworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Epworth HealthCare and Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.subjectRehabilitation, Mental Health and Chronic Pain Clinical Instituteen_US
dc.titleDoes switching between high frequency rTMS and theta burst stimulation improve depression outcomes?en_US
dc.typeLetteren_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.brs.2022.06.005en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleBrain Stimulationen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35714945/en_US
dc.description.affiliatesMonash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesBangkok Hospital, Bang Kapi, Bangkok, Thailanden_US
dc.description.affiliatesThe Adelaide Clinic, Ramsay Health Care (SA) Mental Health Services, South Australia, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesDiscipline of Psychiatry, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, South Australia, Australiaen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Mental Health

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
chen.pdf172.37 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.