Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2112
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPhyland, Ruby-
dc.contributor.authorPonsford, Jennie-
dc.contributor.authorCarrier, Sarah-
dc.contributor.authorHicks, Amelia-
dc.contributor.authorMcKay, Adam-
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-26T04:23:05Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-26T04:23:05Z-
dc.date.issued2021-10-
dc.identifier.citationJ Neurotrauma . 2021 Nov 15;38(22):3047-3067en_US
dc.identifier.issn0897-7151en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/2112-
dc.description.abstractAgitation is a common behavioral problem following traumatic brain injury (TBI); however, the precise proportion of patients who experience agitation in the early stages of recovery is unknown. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the prevalence of agitation in TBI patients undergoing inpatient care, and whether this prevalence differed by post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) status and setting (acute and rehabilitation). We also aimed to describe the prevalence of sub-types of agitated behavior (disinhibited, aggressive, and emotionally labile). We searched five databases and one clinical trials register, with additional review of websites and key journals to identify any relevant records up to July 2020. We included studies describing the proportion of hospitalized TBI patients age 16 years or older demonstrating agitated behavior. We included comparative studies with and without concurrent controls, randomized controlled trials, pseudo-randomized controlled trials, and case series. Methodological quality was critically appraised using a Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Sixteen studies met eligibility criteria, with a total of 5592 participants. The pooled prevalence of agitation was 31.73% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.25%-39.00%) during inpatient care (acute and rehabilitation), 32.23% (95% CI, 27.13%-37.80%) during rehabilitative care and 44.06% (95% CI, 36.15%-52.28%) for inpatients in PTA specifically. Disinhibited behaviors were the most common. There was substantial heterogeneity between studies. Additional high-quality research featuring large samples, frequent and long-term measurement of agitation, use of validated scales, and consideration of variables such as PTA status will further improve estimates of agitation prevalence following TBI.en_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Lieberten_US
dc.subjectAggressionen_US
dc.subjectAgitationen_US
dc.subjectInpatient Careen_US
dc.subjectPost-Traumatic Amnesiaen_US
dc.subjectPTAen_US
dc.subjectPrevelanceen_US
dc.subjectTraumatic Brain Injuryen_US
dc.subjectTBIen_US
dc.subjectDisinhibited Behaviorsen_US
dc.subjectMonash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.subjectRehabilitation, Mental Health and Chronic Pain Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titleAgitated Behaviors following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence by Post-Traumatic Amnesia Status, Hospital Setting, and Agitated Behavior Type.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/neu.2021.0257.en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Neurotraumaen_US
dc.description.pubmeduripubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34435884/en_US
dc.description.affiliatesTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.type.studyortrialSystematic Reviewsen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Rehabilitation

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.