Clinical differences between major burns patients deemed survivable and non-survivable on admission

Abstract

Despite advances in burn care, there is still a group of patients with serious burn injury who fail to respond to therapies or for whom active treatments are unsuccessful. As the demographic and causative factors of burn related mortality may differ between treating units and countries, we aimed to investigate clinical aspects of patients that die whose injuries are considered either survivable or non-survivable on admission.

A retrospective 11-year medical record review (2000–2011) of patients admitted to the Victorian Adult Burns Service (VABS), Melbourne, Australia, with a fatal burn injury was undertaken.

A number of clinical differences in major burn patients can be observed at admission between patients for whom a decision is made as to whether an injury is survivable or non-survivable. These differences may influence the degree of therapeutic aggression or conservatism as determined by the treating clinical team. As a matter of maintaining standards amongst the burns community, reporting mortality data such as this may also provide a benchmark by which other burns units can assess their own data regarding end-of-life decision-making.