Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2167
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Winship, Ingrid | - |
dc.contributor.author | Prado, Luis | - |
dc.contributor.author | Boyle, Jacqueline | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mousa, Mariam | - |
dc.contributor.other | Teede, Helena | - |
dc.contributor.other | Garth, Belinda | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-24T22:51:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-24T22:51:33Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-11 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 15202. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1660-4601 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2167 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Few studies address how to prioritise organisational interventions that advance women in leadership. We report on the relevance, feasibility and importance of evidence-based interventions for a large healthcare organisation. This study supports the first stage of implementation in a large National Health and Medical Research Council funded initiative seeking to advance women in healthcare leadership. Methods: An expert multi-disciplinary panel comprised of health professionals and leaders from a large healthcare network in Australia participated. The initial Delphi survey was administered online and results were presented in a Nominal Group Technique workshop. Here, the group made sense of the survey results, then evaluated findings against a framework on implementation criteria. Two further consensus surveys were conducted during the workshop. Results: Five priority areas were identified. These included: 1. A committed and supportive leadership team; 2. Improved governance structures; 3. Mentoring opportunities; 4. Leadership training and development; and 5. Flexibility in working. We describe the overall priority setting process in the context of our findings. Conclusions: With evidence and expert input, we established priorities for advancing women in healthcare leadership with a partnering healthcare organisation. This approach can be adapted in other settings, seeking to advance women in leadership. | en_US |
dc.publisher | MDPI | en_US |
dc.subject | Health Care | en_US |
dc.subject | NHMRC | en_US |
dc.subject | Implementation | en_US |
dc.subject | Women | en_US |
dc.subject | Expert Multi-Disciplinary Panel | en_US |
dc.subject | Nominal Group Technique | en_US |
dc.subject | Leadership Training and Development | en_US |
dc.subject | Governance Structures | en_US |
dc.subject | Mentoring Opportunities | en_US |
dc.subject | Flexibility in Working | en_US |
dc.subject | Prioritisation | en_US |
dc.subject | Academic and Medical Services, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia | en_US |
dc.title | Using a modified delphi approach and nominal group technique for organisational priority setting of evidence-based interventions that advance women in healthcare leadership. | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/ ijerph192215202 | en_US |
dc.identifier.journaltitle | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health | en_US |
dc.description.affiliates | Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, VIC 3168, Australia | en_US |
dc.description.affiliates | Rural Health, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, VIC 3168, Australia | en_US |
dc.description.affiliates | Health Systems and Equity, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, VIC 3168, Australia | en_US |
dc.type.studyortrial | Survey | en_US |
dc.type.contenttype | Text | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Health Administration |
Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.