Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2180
Title: Impact of the approach on conversion to open surgery during minimally invasive restorative total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Epworth Authors: McCormick, Jacob
Heriot, Alexander
Warrier, Satish
Other Authors: Larach, Jose
Kong, Joseph
Flynn, Julie
Wright, Timothy
Mohan, Helen
Waters, Peadar
Keywords: Conversion
Laparoscopic
Rectal Cancer
Robotic
Total Mesorectal Excision
Transanal
Proctectomy
Transabdominal
Minimally Invasive
Cancer Services Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia
General Surgery and Gastrointestinal Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: Mar-2023
Publisher: Springer
Citation: Int J Colorectal Dis . 2023 Mar 27;38(1):83
Abstract: Background: The aim of this study is to explore the impact of the approach on conversion in patients undergoing minimally invasive restorative total mesorectal excision within a single unit. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients with rectal cancer undergoing minimally invasive restorative total mesorectal excision between January 2006 and June 2020 were included. Subjects were classified according to the presence or absence of conversion. Baseline variables and short-term outcomes were compared. Regression analyses were conducted to assess the relationship between the approach and conversion. Results: During the study period, 318 patients underwent a restorative proctectomy. Of these, 240 met the inclusion criteria. Robotic and laparoscopic approaches were undertaken in 147 (61.3%) and 93 (38.8%) cases, respectively. A transanal approach was utilised in 62 (25.8%) cases (58.1% in combination with a robotic transabdominal approach). Conversion to open surgery occurred in 30 cases (12.5%). Conversion was associated with an increased overall complication rate (P = 0.003), surgical complications (P = 0.009), superficial surgical site infections (P = 0.02) and an increased length of hospital stay (P = 0.006). Robotic and transanal approaches were both associated with decreased conversion rates. The multiple logistic regression analysis, however, showed that only a transanal approach was independently associated with a lower risk of conversion (OR 0.147, 0.023-0.532; P = 0.01), whilst obesity was an independent risk factor for conversion (OR 4.388, 1.852-10.56; P < 0.00). Conclusions: A transanal component is associated with a reduced conversion rate in minimally invasive restorative total mesorectal excision, regardless of the transabdominal approach utilised. Larger studies will be required to confirm these findings and define which subgroup of patients could benefit from transanal component when a robotic approach is undertaken.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2180
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04382-0
PubMed URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36971883/
ISSN: 1432-1262
Journal Title: International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Type: Journal Article
Affiliated Organisations: Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Department of Oncology, Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Department of Oncology, Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Retrospective studies
Appears in Collections:Cancer Services

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.