Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2202
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNoye, Suzie-
dc.contributor.otherHutchinson, Anastasia-
dc.contributor.otherWilcox, Jane-
dc.contributor.otherKumar, Koshila-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-16T03:47:28Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-16T03:47:28Z-
dc.date.issued2023-08-
dc.identifier.issn1322-7696en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/2202-
dc.description.abstractProblem: Despite mandated Rapid-Response Systems (RRS), hospitals continue to see delays in escalation of care. There is a paucity of research regarding nurses’ perceptions of the reasons for care escalation delays in the private hospital setting in which there is a different model of care and hierarchy of the medical system. It is important to understand how these elements may influence the approach to escalating care. Aim: To explore nurses’ perspectives and experiences of clinical deterioration and the factors impacting on timely escalation of care in a private, non-profit hospital. Method: Twenty-three bedside and leadership nurses were purposively recruited. Qualitative descriptive methodology employed interviews and focus groups to explore knowledge of, and belief in RRS criteria and process, individual confidence, perceived barriers, and RRS education. Data were analysed thematically. Findings: Three major themes were elicited. First, hierarchy and a culture of indecisiveness. Second, gatekeeping and protocol adherence impacting on timely escalation. Third, the importance of confidence in the nurse role to escalate care. Communication barriers and inconsistent leadership were common threads across all themes. Discussion: RRS have been shown to be effective, however, if escalation criteria are implemented inconsistently, individual’s prior experience can impact interdisciplinary communication, RRS processes and patient outcomes. Conclusion: The effectiveness of RRS is dependent on a supportive workplace culture, good communication, and consistent leadership. Further research is required to understand the optimal mechanisms for implementing RRS processes in private, non-profit hospitals.en_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectEscalationen_US
dc.subjectRapid Response Systemen_US
dc.subjectRRSen_US
dc.subjectClinical Deteriorationen_US
dc.subjectLeadershipen_US
dc.subjectCommunicationen_US
dc.subjectBarriersen_US
dc.subjectInterdisciplinary Teamsen_US
dc.subjectTeamworken_US
dc.subjectPerceptionen_US
dc.subjectNurseen_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectWorkplace Cultureen_US
dc.subjectCentre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Epworth HealthCare Partnershipen_US
dc.subjectEpworth HealthCare Geelong, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titleNurses’ perspectives on delays in care escalation in an acute private hospital.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.colegn.2023.07.006en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleCollegianen_US
dc.description.affiliatesDeakin University, Institute for Health Transformation, Centre for Quality & Patient Safety Research, Epworth HealthCare partnership, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesFlinders University, Prideaux Discipline of Clinical Education, College of Medicine and Public Health, Bedford Park, Adelaide, Australiaen_US
dc.type.studyortrialQualitative Designen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Health Administration

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.