Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2266
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCribb, Benjamin-
dc.contributor.authorKong, Jospeh-
dc.contributor.authorMcCormick, Jacob-
dc.contributor.authorWarrier, Satish-
dc.contributor.authorHeriot, Alexander-
dc.date2021-11-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-23T00:49:45Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-23T00:49:45Z-
dc.date.issued2022-03-
dc.identifier.citationInt J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Mar;37(3):583-595en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-1262en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/2266-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) may improve oncological outcomes for select patients with rectal cancer, though functional outcomes may be adversely impacted. The aim of this study is to assess the functional outcomes associated with LPLND for rectal cancer and compare these outcomes with standard surgical resection. Methods: A systematic search was undertaken to identify relevant studies reporting on urinary dysfunction (UD), sexual dysfunction (SD), and defecatory dysfunction (DD) for patients who underwent LPLND for rectal cancer. Studies comparing functional outcomes in patients who underwent surgery with and without LPLND were assessed. In addition, a comparison of functional outcomes in patients who underwent LPLND before and after the year 2000 was performed. Results: Twenty-one studies of predominantly non-randomised observational data were included. Ten were comparative studies. Male SD was worse in patients who underwent LPLND compared with those who did not (RR 1.68 (95% CI 1.41-1.99, P < 0.001)). No difference was observed for the rate of UD between treatment groups. The rates of UD and male SD in patients who underwent LPLND after the year 2000 were significantly lower than those who underwent LPLND before the year 2000 ((UD) RR = 4.5, p value = 0.0034; male SD RR = 28.7, p value < 0.001). Conclusion: Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection is associated with worse male sexual dysfunction compared to standard surgical resection. However, the rates of urine dysfunction and male sexual dysfunction are better in contemporary cohorts which may reflect improved surgical technique and autonomic nerve preservation.en_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.subjectCanceren_US
dc.subjectRectal Canceren_US
dc.subjectRectal adenocarcinomaen_US
dc.subjectLymphadenectomyen_US
dc.subjectExtended Lymphadenectomyen_US
dc.subjectLymph Node Dissectionen_US
dc.subjectLateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissectionen_US
dc.subjectLPLNDen_US
dc.subjectFunctional outcomesen_US
dc.subjectUrinary Dysfunctionen_US
dc.subjectUDen_US
dc.subjectSexual Dysfunctionen_US
dc.subjectSDen_US
dc.subjectDefecatory Dysfunctionen_US
dc.subjectDDen_US
dc.subjectEpworth Cancer Services Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titleFunctional outcomes after lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00384-021-04073-8en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleInternational Journal of Colorectal Diseaseen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34846550/en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesThe Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.type.studyortrialReviews/Systematic Reviewsen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Cancer Services

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.