Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2269
Title: Trial of Vancomycin and Cefazolin as surgical prophylaxis in arthroplasty.
Epworth Authors: de Steiger, Richard
Other Authors: Peel, Trisha
Astbury, Sarah
Cheng, Allen
Paterson, David
Buising, Kirsty
Spelman, Tim
Tran-Duy, An
Adie, Sam
Boyce, Glen
McDougall, Catherine
Molnar, Robert
Mulford, Jonathan
Rehfisch, Peter
Solomon, Michael
Crawford, Ross
Harris-Brown, Tiffany
Roney, Janine
Wisniewski
Keywords: Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Arthroplasty
Cefazolin
Vancomycin
Staphylococcal Infections
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Surgical-Site infections
Musculoskeletal Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: 19-Oct-2023
Publisher: NEJM Group
Citation: N Engl J Med . 2023 Oct 19;389(16):1488-1498
Abstract: Background: The addition of vancomycin to beta-lactam prophylaxis in arthroplasty may reduce surgical-site infections; however, the efficacy and safety are unclear. Methods: In this multicenter, double-blind, superiority, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned adult patients without known methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization who were undergoing arthroplasty to receive 1.5 g of vancomycin or normal saline placebo, in addition to cefazolin prophylaxis. The primary outcome was surgical-site infection within 90 days after surgery. Results: A total of 4239 patients underwent randomization. Among 4113 patients in the modified intention-to-treat population (2233 undergoing knee arthroplasty, 1850 undergoing hip arthroplasty, and 30 undergoing shoulder arthroplasty), surgical-site infections occurred in 91 of 2044 patients (4.5%) in the vancomycin group and in 72 of 2069 patients (3.5%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94 to 1.73; P = 0.11). Among patients undergoing knee arthroplasty, surgical-site infections occurred in 63 of 1109 patients (5.7%) in the vancomyin group and in 42 of 1124 patients (3.7%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.23). Among patients undergoing hip arthroplasty, surgical-site infections occurred in 28 of 920 patients (3.0%) in the vancomyin group and in 29 of 930 patients (3.1%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.63). Adverse events occurred in 35 of 2010 patients (1.7%) in the vancomycin group and in 35 of 2030 patients (1.7%) in the placebo group, including hypersensitivity reactions in 24 of 2010 patients (1.2%) and 11 of 2030 patients (0.5%), respectively (relative risk, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.08 to 4.49), and acute kidney injury in 42 of 2010 patients (2.1%) and 74 of 2030 patients (3.6%), respectively (relative risk, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.83). Conclusions: The addition of vancomycin to cefazolin prophylaxis was not superior to placebo for the prevention of surgical-site infections in arthroplasty among patients without known MRSA colonization. (Funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12618000642280.).
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2269
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2301401
PubMed URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37851875/
ISSN: 0028-4793
Journal Title: New England Journal of Medicine
Type: Journal Article
Affiliated Organisations: Department of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health, Victoria, Australia
Department of Infectious Diseases, Doherty Institute, Victoria, Australia
Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, Victoria, Australia
Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Victoria, Australia
Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
St. George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales Medicine and Health, New South Wales, Australia
Bendigo Health, Victoria, Australia
Department of Orthopaedics, Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia
Department of Medicine, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia
Department of Orthopaedics, Launceston General Hospital, Tasmanian Health Service, Tasmania, Australia
Gippsland Orthopaedic Group, Victoria, Australia
Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Private Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
Advancing Clinical Evidence in Infectious Diseases, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore
Infectious Diseases Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Sweden
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Controlled Clinical Trial
Appears in Collections:Musculoskeletal

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.