Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/308
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWillmott, Catherine-
dc.contributor.authorPonsford, Jennie-
dc.contributor.authorDowning, Marina-
dc.contributor.authorCarty, Meagan-
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-17T06:04:09Z-
dc.date.available2015-08-17T06:04:09Z-
dc.date.issued2014-05-
dc.identifier.citationJ Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014 May-Jun;29(3):248-56.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1550 509Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/308-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To examine the frequency and experience of return to secondary or tertiary study over a 10-year period following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Participants: A group of 295 students with moderate to severe TBI followed prospectively. Setting: Epworth HealthCare TBI outpatient rehabilitation program follow-up clinic 1 to 10 years postinjury. Main Outcome Measures: Frequency of return to study. Also, for a subset, changes in course enrollment, utilization of additional educational supports, and experience of return to study postinjury. Results: Of those studying preinjury, 295 attended the follow-up clinic appointments, with 167 (56%) having returned to study. Those who did not return to study had significantly longer posttraumatic amnesia duration. The cross-sectional follow-up revealed that 60.4% were studying at 1 year postinjury, 37.5% at 2 years postinjury, 50.0% at 3 years postinjury, 31.1% at 5 years postinjury, and 2.0% at 10 years postinjury. Many had migrated into employment. A subsample of 95 participants reported on their educational experience. Of those, 28.7% changed their course enrollment from full-time to part-time. While supports such as tuition and special consideration were greatly increased postinjury, students reported the proportion of subjects passed of 79.0%. However, they experienced cognitive difficulties and fatigue and felt less satisfied with their studies. Conclusions: Return to study was relatively successful; however, this was associated with the experience of fatigue and need for far greater effort, assistance and reduced study hours, and somewhat less overall satisfaction.en_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkinsen_US
dc.subjectTraumatic Brain Injuryen_US
dc.subjectReturn to Studyen_US
dc.subjectPosttraumatic Amnesiaen_US
dc.subjectReduced Study Hoursen_US
dc.subjectFatigueen_US
dc.subjectMonash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.-
dc.titleFrequency and quality of return to study following traumatic brain injury.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/HTR.0000000000000014en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitationen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24413073en_US
dc.description.affiliatesMonash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesMonash Psychology Centre, School of Psychology & Psychiatry, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesNational Trauma Research Institute, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.type.studyortrialCohort Studyen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Neurosciences
Rehabilitation

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.