Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/315
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Gregor-
dc.contributor.otherBurgess, Nicholas-
dc.contributor.otherMetz, Andrew-
dc.contributor.otherWilliams, Stephen-
dc.contributor.otherSingh, Rajvinder-
dc.contributor.otherTam, William-
dc.contributor.otherHourigan, Luke-
dc.contributor.otherZanati, Simon-
dc.contributor.otherSonson, Rebecca-
dc.contributor.otherBourke, Michael-
dc.date2013-10-01-
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-18T03:47:15Z-
dc.date.available2015-08-18T03:47:15Z-
dc.date.issued2014-04-
dc.identifier.citationClin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Apr;12(4):651-61.e1-3.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1542-3565en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/315-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND & AIMS: Wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) of large sessile colonic polyps is a safe and cost-effective outpatient treatment. Bleeding is the main complication. Few studies have examined risk factors for bleeding during the procedure (intraprocedural bleeding [IPB]) or after it (clinically significant post-endoscopic bleeding [CSPEB]). We investigated factors associated with IPB and CSPEB in a large prospective study. METHODS: We analyzed data from WF-EMRs of sessile colorectal polyps ≥ 20 mm in size (mean size, 35.5 mm), which were performed on 1172 patients (mean age, 67.8 years) from June 2008-March 2013 at 7 tertiary hospitals as part of the Australian Colonic Endoscopic Resection Study. Data were collected on characteristics of patients and lesions, along with outcomes of procedures and clinical and histologic analyses. Independent predictors of IPB and CSPEB were identified by multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the patients studied, 133 (11.3%) had IPB. Independent predictors included increasing lesion size (odds ratio, 1.24/10 mm; P < .001), Paris endoscopic classification of 0-IIa + Is (odds ratio, 2.12; P = .004), tubulovillous or villous histology (odds ratio, 1.84; P = .007), and study institutions that performed the procedure on fewer than 75 patients (odds ratio, 3.78; P < .001). All IPB was successfully controlled endoscopically. IPB prolonged procedures and was associated with early recurrence (relative risk, 1.68; P = .011). Seventy-three patients (6.2%) had CSPEB. On multivariable analysis, CSPEB was associated with proximal colon location (odds ratio, 3.72; P < .001), use of an electrosurgical current not controlled by a microprocessor (odds ratio, 2.03; P = .038), and IPB (odds ratio, 2.16; P = .016). Lesion size and comorbidities did not predict CSPEB. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study of patients undergoing WF-EMR of large sessile colonic polyps, IPB is associated with larger lesions, lesion histology, and Paris endoscopic classification of type 0-IIa + Is. IPB prolongs the duration of the procedure, is a marker for recurrence, and is associated with CSPEB. CSPEB occurs most frequently in the proximal colon and less when current is controlled by a microprocessor.en_US
dc.publisherW.B. Saunders for the American Gastroenterological Associationen_US
dc.subjectACE Studyen_US
dc.subjectColonoscopyen_US
dc.subjectColorectal Neoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectHemorrhageen_US
dc.subjectPolypectomyen_US
dc.subjectWF-EMRen_US
dc.subjectBleedingen_US
dc.subjectIntraprocedural Bleedingen_US
dc.subjectClinically Significant Post-Endoscopic Bleedingen_US
dc.subjectIPBen_US
dc.subjectCSPEBen_US
dc.subjectSessile Colorectal Polypsen_US
dc.subjectAustralian Colonic Endoscopic Resection Studyen_US
dc.subjectMultiple Logistic Regression Analysisen_US
dc.subjectTubulovillous or Villous Histologyen_US
dc.subjectParis Endoscopic Classificationen_US
dc.subjectDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Epworth Hospital, Melbourne VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.titleRisk factors for intraprocedural and clinically significant delayed bleeding after wide-field endoscopic musocal resection of large colonic lesions.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cgh.2013.09.049en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Associationen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24090728en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Sydney at Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Western Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.type.studyortrialProspective Cohort Studyen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:General Surgery and Gastroenterology

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.