Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11434/360Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Williams, Gavin | - |
| dc.contributor.other | Morris, Meg | - |
| dc.date | 2011-12 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-09-09T05:40:11Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-09-09T05:40:11Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2011-12 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Physiotherapy Canada 2011 Winter;63(1):58-64 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0300-0508 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1708-8313 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11434/360 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | PURPOSE: To investigate the extent to which different single-limb support (SLS) parameters predict mobility performance following traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: Seventy-one people with mobility limitations following TBI were assessed for balance and mobility performance in a human movement laboratory. Participants performed a clinical test of static balance that involved balancing in SLS on each leg with eyes open and eyes closed. Mobility performance was measured by self-selected gait speed and performance on the High Level Mobility Scale (HiMAT). Dynamic stability during walking was measured by quantifying lateral centre of mass (COM) displacement, width of base of support, and proportion of double-support stance time. RESULTS: Total static balance scores were strongly correlated with HiMAT scores (r=0.57, p<0.001) and lateral COM displacement (r=-0.51, p<0.001). Despite these strong correlations, however, balance scores explained only 32% of the variance in advanced mobility skills (r(2)=0.32) and 26% of the variance in lateral COM displacement (r(2)=0.26). CONCLUSIONS: Since mobility performance varied widely for people with similar levels of balance, SLS time was not able to predict dynamic stability during gait, self-selected gait speed, or advanced mobility skills in people with TBI. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | University of Toronto Press | en_US |
| dc.subject | Physiotherapy Department, Epworth Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | en_US |
| dc.subject | Brain Injuries, Traumatic | en_US |
| dc.subject | Injury, Brain, Traumatic | en_US |
| dc.subject | Trauma, Brain | en_US |
| dc.subject | Traumatic Brain Injury | en_US |
| dc.subject | Gait | en_US |
| dc.subject | Mobility Limitation | en_US |
| dc.subject | Postural Balance | en_US |
| dc.subject | Balance, Postural | en_US |
| dc.subject | Patient Outcome Assessment | en_US |
| dc.subject | Assessment, Patient Outcomes | en_US |
| dc.subject | Outcomes Assessments, Patient | en_US |
| dc.subject | Assessment, Risk | en_US |
| dc.subject | Risk Assessment | en_US |
| dc.subject | Stroke | en_US |
| dc.subject | Cerebrovascular Accident | en_US |
| dc.subject | Vascular Accident, Brain | en_US |
| dc.subject | Hemiplegia | en_US |
| dc.subject | Muscle Strength | en_US |
| dc.subject | Data Analysis | en_US |
| dc.subject | TBI | en_US |
| dc.subject | Balance | en_US |
| dc.title | Tests of static balance do not predict mobility performance following traumatic brain injury. | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3138/ptc.2009-53 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.journaltitle | Physiotherapy Canada | en_US |
| dc.description.pubmeduri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22210980 | en_US |
| dc.description.affiliates | Victorian Neurotrauma Initiative | - |
| dc.description.affiliates | Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | - |
| dc.type.studyortrial | Cohort Study | en_US |
| dc.type.contenttype | Text | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Neurosciences Rehabilitation | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tests of Static Balance Do Not Predict Mobility.pdf | 435.66 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.