Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/403
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBotti, Mari-
dc.contributor.authorKhaw, Damien-
dc.contributor.authorRedley, Bernice-
dc.contributor.otherJorgensen, Emmy-
dc.contributor.otherRasmussen, Bodi-
dc.contributor.otherHunter, Susan-
dc.date2015-05-
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-07T00:54:32Z-
dc.date.available2015-10-07T00:54:32Z-
dc.date.issued2015-08-
dc.identifier.citationJ Pain. 2015 Aug;16(8):727-40en_US
dc.identifier.issn1526-5900en_US
dc.identifier.issn1528-8447en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/403-
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated the cross-cultural factor stability and internal consistency of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R), a measure of the quality of postoperative pain management used internationally. We conducted exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of APS-POQ-R data from 2 point prevalence studies comprising 268 and 311 surveys of Danish and Australian medical-surgical patients, respectively. Parallel analysis indicated 4- and 3-factor solutions for Danish and Australian patients, respectively, which accounted for 58.1% and 52.9% of variance. Internal consistency was unsatisfactory among both Danish (Cronbach α = .54) and Australian (Cronbach α = .63) cohorts. There was a high degree of between-group similarity in item-factor loadings of variables coded as "pain experience," but not "pain management." This finding reflected cross-cultural differences in ratings of treatment satisfaction. For Danish patients, satisfaction was associated with the degree of pain severity and activity interference, whereas for Australian patients, satisfaction was associated with their perceived ability to participate in treatment. To facilitate further cross-cultural comparison, we compared our findings with past research conducted in the United States and Iceland. EFA supported the construct validity of the APS-POQ-R as a measure of "pain experience" but indicated that items measuring "pain management" may vary cross-culturally. Findings highlighted the need for further validation of the APS-POQ-R internationally. PERSPECTIVE: This study revealed the APS-POQ-R as a valid measure of postoperative pain experience for Danish and Australian patients. Measures of patients' perception of pain management were not robust to group differences in treatment expectations and demonstrated cross-cultural instability. Results highlighted the difficulties in establishing stable cross-cultural, cross-population subscales for the APS-POQ-R.en_US
dc.publisherAmerican Pain Societyen_US
dc.subjectCross Culturalen_US
dc.subjectPainen_US
dc.subjectPain Managementen_US
dc.subjectRevised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaireen_US
dc.subjectPostoperative Pain Managementen_US
dc.subjectPain Experienceen_US
dc.subjectCultural Differencesen_US
dc.subjectDenmarken_US
dc.subjectConstruct Validityen_US
dc.subjectPatient Participationen_US
dc.subjectQuality Improvementen_US
dc.subjectEpworth/Deakin Centre for Clinical Nursing Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.titleCross-Cultural Examination of the Structure of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R).en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jpain.2015.03.016en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleThe Journal of Painen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25998207en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Nursing Research, VIA University College, Holstebro, Denmarken_US
dc.description.affiliatesHospitalsenheden Vest, Region Midtjylland, Denmarken_US
dc.description.affiliatesSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.type.studyortrialSurveyen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Pain Management

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.