Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/480
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCostello, Anthony-
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Declan-
dc.contributor.authorWalton, Anthony-
dc.contributor.otherCathcart, Paul-
dc.contributor.otherConnolly, Stephen-
dc.date2011-09-
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-20T05:39:09Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-20T05:39:09Z-
dc.date.issued2011-11-
dc.identifier.citationJ Urol. 2011 Nov;186(5):2133-4en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-5347en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/480-
dc.description.abstractComment on Administrative data sets are inaccurate for assessing functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy. [J Urol. 2011]en_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectRadical Prostatectomyen_US
dc.subjectFunctional Outcomesen_US
dc.subjectErectile Dysfunctionen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectOutcome Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectPostoperative Complicationsen_US
dc.subjectProstectomyen_US
dc.subjectUrinary Incontinenceen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectAustralian Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth Richmond Hospitalen_US
dc.titleRe: Administrative data sets are inaccurate for assessing functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: M. K. Tollefson, M. T. Gettman, R. J. Karnes and I. Frank J Urol 2011; 185: 1686-1690.en_US
dc.typeLetteren_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.014en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Urologyen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21944984en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Cancer Services
Epworth Prostate Centre
UroRenal, Vascular

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.