Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/698
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMoon, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorFrydenberg, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorCostello, Anthony-
dc.contributor.authorBotti, Mari-
dc.contributor.otherZargar, Homayoun-
dc.date2016-05-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-07T02:05:44Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-07T02:05:44Z-
dc.date.issued2016-05-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Urology. 2016 May 9;195(4S): e995.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/698-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: We aimed to prospectively and independently assess real world outcomes of Australian mens' urinary and sexual function following retropubic (RRP), laparoscopic (LRP) and robotic assisted (RARP) radical prostatectomy surgery for localized prostate cancer Methods: From 2009 to 2012 men with localized prostate cancer undergoing surgery by one of fourteen study urologists working across eight private-sector sites were included in the study. Patients were consented for the study and data was collected by self-reported questionnaires prospectively at 3,6,12,18 and 24 months by researchers independent of treating urologists. Urinary and sexual function data were obtained using EPIC, SHIM and IPSS questionnaires. Results: Overall 1005 men were recruited with the study participation rate of 79.2%, with 836 men having completed surveys at each follow-up (Table 1). At 24 months follow up the median EPIC urinary and sexual summary scores were at 95.6 and 47.4% of baseline respectively. The rate of erectile function preservation at 24 months in men with good erectile function preoperatively (SHIM≥ 20) was 27% for the entire cohort. On multivariable cox regression model (including age, Gleason score, prostate volume, preoperative SHIM score, surgical modality), age (OR 0.94 95% CI (0.91-0.97); p=0.001), preoperative erectile function (OR 1.26 95% CI (1.14-.41); p<0.001) and laparoscopic approach (OR 0.23 95% CI (0.09-0.60); p=0.002) were predictors of good erectile function at 24 months. Conclusions: Surgical therapy for localized prostate cancer provides excellent long-term urinary function as measured by EPIC urinary summary score in our series. Long-term sexual function was less preserved as demonstrated by 24 months EPIC sexual summary score. The rate of sexual function preservation for men with good pre-existing sexual function treated by surgical therapy in this real world prospective independently collected community based study is far lower than previously reported by tertiary referral centres. Pre-existing erectile function, age and modality of surgery impact the final long-term sexual function. The impact of surgeons' training and experience are likely to be important determiners of long-term sexual function and will be addressed in future studies.en_US
dc.relation.urihttps://www.auanet.org/university/abstract_detail.cfm?id=PD43-08&meetingID=16SAN-
dc.subjectProstatic Neoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectProstate Canceren_US
dc.subjectCancer of the Prostateen_US
dc.subjectUrinary Functionen_US
dc.subjectSexual Functionen_US
dc.subjectProstatectomyen_US
dc.subjectProstatectomy, Retropubicen_US
dc.subjectProstatectomy, Laparoscopicen_US
dc.subjectRobotic Assisted Prostatectomyen_US
dc.subjectSurgical Procedures, Operativeen_US
dc.subjectRRPen_US
dc.subjectLRPen_US
dc.subjectRARPen_US
dc.subjectEPIC Questionnaireen_US
dc.subjectSHIM Questionnaireen_US
dc.subjectIPSS Questionnaireen_US
dc.subjectCox Regression Modelen_US
dc.subjectGleason Scoreen_US
dc.subjectEpworth Prostate Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.subjectUroRenal, Vascular Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.subjectEpworth/Deakin Centre for Clinical Nursing Research, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titleProspective longitudinal comparative study of long-term urinary and sexual function after primary surgical treatment for localized prostate cancer.en_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.description.affiliatesSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Urology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Surgery, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesCentre for Urological Research (CURe), Monash Institute of Medical Research (MIMR) , Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.type.studyortrialComparative Studyen_US
dc.description.conferencenameAmerican Urological Association Conferenceen_US
dc.description.conferencelocationSan Diego, California, U.S.en_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Cancer Services
Epworth Prostate Centre
UroRenal, Vascular

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.