Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/752
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHoward, Nicholas-
dc.contributor.authorPillay, Brindha-
dc.contributor.authorXiberras, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorHoti, Vlora-
dc.contributor.authorCrowe, Helen-
dc.contributor.authorPeters, Justin-
dc.contributor.authorMoon, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorWootten, Addie-
dc.contributor.authorCorcoran, Niall-
dc.contributor.authorCostello, Anthony-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T04:56:11Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-30T04:56:11Z-
dc.date.issued2016-07-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/752-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Patient expectations for recovery following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) may influence adjustment following treatment. There is little data regarding the treatment expectations of Australian RARP patients. This study aimed to assess the difference between patient-reported pre-operative sexual and urinary function, and expected functioning at 12 months post-RARP. METHODS: Patients undergoing RARP for localised prostate cancer were recruited from urology practices between June 2015 and APril 2016 as part of an ongoing study. Pre-operative sexual and urinary function and expected functioning at 12 months post-RARP were measure using the Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC)-26 and EPIC-26 (Expectations). Paired samples t-tests were used to assess the difference between pre-operative and expected function at 12 months post-surgery. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients completed questionnaires at baseline. Compared to pre-operative functioning, 35%, 27% and 63% of patients expected worse Urinary Incontinence (UI), Urinary Irritative/Obstructive (UQ) and Sexual (S) function respectively, at 12 months post-RARP. Conversely 12%, 15% and 10% of patients expected better UI, UQ and S function compared to preoperative function. As many as 53%, 58% and 27% of patients expected UI, UQ and S function respectively to recover to baseline levels at 12 months post-RARP. Patients expected worse UI (p=0.003), UQ (p=0.038) and S function (p<0.001) at 12 months post-RARP compared to preoperative functioning. CONCLUSION: The majority of men believed that their urinary and sexual function at 12 months post-surgery would be unchanged or worse compared to preoperative levels. Understanding RARP patients' expectations may assist in development of supportive care interventions to ensure realistic expectations of quality of life post-surgery.en_US
dc.subjectRobotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomyen_US
dc.subjectRARPen_US
dc.subjectLocalised Prostate Canceren_US
dc.subjectSexual Functionen_US
dc.subjectUrinary Functionen_US
dc.subjectUrinary Incontinenceen_US
dc.subjectUrinary Obstructiveen_US
dc.subjectPre-Operativeen_US
dc.subjectExpanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26en_US
dc.subjectExpectationsen_US
dc.subjectEPIC Questionnaireen_US
dc.subjectEPIC-26en_US
dc.subjectMenen_US
dc.subjectInterventionen_US
dc.subjectAustralian Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.subjectCancer Services Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titleExamining the role of pre-operative expectations on patient-reported quality of life, following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: Prelimary analysis of baseline data.en_US
dc.typeConference Posteren_US
dc.description.affiliatesThe Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia.en_US
dc.type.studyortrialComparative Studyen_US
dc.description.conferencenameEpworth Research Institute Research Week 2016en_US
dc.description.conferencelocationEpworth HealthCare, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Cancer Services
Epworth Prostate Centre
Research Week
UroRenal, Vascular

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.