Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/779
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNew, Peter-
dc.contributor.otherScroggie, Grant-
dc.contributor.otherWilliams, Cylie-
dc.date2016-06-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-09T04:21:57Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-09T04:21:57Z-
dc.date.issued2016-06-
dc.identifier.citationDisabil Rehabil. 2016 Jun 23:1-5.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0963-8288en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/779-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Determine the clinimetric properties of the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) in an adult inpatient rehabilitation population. METHOD: Prospective open cohort case series. DEMMI and functional independence measure assessed within three days of admission and discharge and seven-point Likert assessment of global change in mobility during inpatient rehabilitation reported by the patient, physical therapist and rehabilitation physician. RESULTS: A total of 366 patients had assessments of the DEMMI completed on both admission into and discharge from rehabilitation. There was no floor or ceiling effect observed in the sample, but there was a mild (19%) ceiling effect at discharge in patients with a stroke. Evidence was obtained for the convergent, discriminant and known group validity of the DEMMI. The minimal clinically important difference was obtained using two methods. The DEMMI was highly responsive to change (Cohen's dā€‰=ā€‰1.3). CONCLUSIONS: The findings give support to the use of the DEMMI in rehabilitation patients and on the basis of previous studies, support the use of the DEMMI across the continuum of hospital settings. Implications for rehabilitation This study provides evidence that the clinimetric properties of the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) are sound. The findings give support to the use of the DEMMI in rehabilitation patients. Our findings, in conjunction with previous research, support the use of the DEMMI across the continuum of hospital settings.en_US
dc.publisherTaylors & Francisen_US
dc.subjectMobility Limitationen_US
dc.subjectde Morton Mobility Indexen_US
dc.subjectOutcome Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectPsychometricsen_US
dc.subjectDEMMIen_US
dc.subjectRehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectValidityen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectEpworth-Monash Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Southern Medical School, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.titleThe validity, reliability, responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the de Morton mobility index in rehabilitation.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09638288.2016.1179800en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleDisability and Rehabilitationen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27334796en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Medical Program, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesPhysiotherapy Department, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesAllied Health Research Unit, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesPhysiotherapy Department, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.type.studyortrialProspective Cohort Studyen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Dermatology
Rehabilitation

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.