Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/85
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor-
dc.contributor.authorGrummet, Jeremyen
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Declanen
dc.contributor.otherMann, Sarahen
dc.contributor.otherGrummet, H.en
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-11T00:37:31Zen
dc.date.available2014-09-11T00:37:31Zen
dc.date.issued2014-03en
dc.identifier.citationBJU International Volume 113, Issue Supplement S4, page 140, March 2014en
dc.identifier.issn1464-410Xen
dc.identifier.issn1464-4096en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/85en
dc.description.abstractTransperineal biopsy is gaining traction as an approach that confers a near-zero risk of sepsis with excellent prostate sampling, including targeting of MRI-detected lesions. However, one factor that may cause reluctance to perform transperineal biopsy is the perception of it being a lengthy procedure compared to TRUS biopsy.en
dc.subjectTransperineal Biopsyen
dc.subjectSepisen
dc.subjectProstateen
dc.titleTransperineal biopsy streamlineden
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doidoi/10.1111/bju.12620en
dc.identifier.journaltitleBJU Internationalen
dc.description.affiliatesAustralian Urology Associatesen
Appears in Collections:Cancer Services
Epworth Prostate Centre
UroRenal, Vascular

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.