Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/901
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Gregor-
dc.contributor.authorMoss, Alan-
dc.contributor.otherJayanna, Mahes-
dc.contributor.otherBurgess, Nicholas-
dc.contributor.otherSingh, Rajvinder-
dc.contributor.otherHourigan, Luke-
dc.contributor.otherZanati, Simon-
dc.contributor.otherLim, James-
dc.contributor.otherSonson, Rebecca-
dc.contributor.otherWilliams, Stephen-
dc.contributor.otherBourke, Michael-
dc.date2015-09-
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-22T02:27:06Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-22T02:27:06Z-
dc.date.issued2016-02-
dc.identifier.citationClin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Feb;14(2):271-8.e1-2.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1542-3565en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/901-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND & AIMS: Large laterally spreading lesions (LSL) in the colon and rectum can be safely and effectively removed by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). However, many patients still undergo surgery. Endoscopic treatment may be more cost effective. We compared the costs of endoscopic versus surgical management of large LSL. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational, multicenter study of consecutive patients referred to 1 of 7 academic hospitals in Australia for the management of large LSL (≥ 20 mm) from January 2010 to December 2013. We collected data on numbers of patients undergoing EMR, actual endoscopic management costs (index colonoscopy, hospital stay, adverse events, and first surveillance colonoscopy), characteristics of patients and lesions, outcomes, and adverse events, and findings from follow-up examinations 14 days, 4-6 months, and 16-18 months after treatment. We compared data from patients who underwent EMR with those from a model in which all patients underwent surgery without any complications. Event-specific costs, based on Australian refined diagnosis-related group codes, were used to estimate average cost per patient. RESULTS: EMR was performed on 1489 lesions (mean size, 36 mm) in 1353 patients (mean age, 67 years; 52.1% male). Total costs involved in the endoscopic management of large LSL were US $6,316,593 and total inpatient hospitalization length of stay was 1180 days. The total cost predicted for the surgical management group was US $16,601,502, with a total inpatient hospitalization length of stay of 4986 days. Endoscopic management produced a potential total cost saving of US $10,284,909; the mean cost difference per patient was US $7602 (95% confidence interval, $8458-$9220; P < .001). Inpatient hospitalization length of stay was reduced by 2.81 nights per patient (95% confidence interval, 2.69-2.94; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In a large multicenter study, endoscopic management of large LSL by EMR was significantly more cost-effective than surgery. Endoscopic management by EMR at an appropriately experienced and resourced tertiary center should be considered the first line of therapy for most patients with this disorder. This approach is likely to deliver substantial overall health expenditure savings. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT01368289.en_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectAcademic Medical Centersen_US
dc.subjectCost Analysisen_US
dc.subjectColorectal Neoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectColonen_US
dc.subjectRectumen_US
dc.subjectSurgical Procedures, Operativeen_US
dc.subjectEconomicsen_US
dc.subjectLaterally Spreading Lesionsen_US
dc.subjectLSLen_US
dc.subjectEndoscopic Mucosal Resectionen_US
dc.subjectEMRen_US
dc.subjectTreatmenten_US
dc.subjectManagementen_US
dc.subjectThe Australian Colonic Endoscopic Resection (ACE) studyen_US
dc.subjectGeneral Surgery and Gastroenterology Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.subjectDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Epworth Hospital, Melbourne VIC, Australia.-
dc.titleCost analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection vs surgery for large laterally spreading colorectal lesions.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cgh.2015.08.037en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatologyen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26364679en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesWestmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Endoscopic Services, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesUniversity of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Monash Health, Dandenong, Australia.en_US
dc.type.studyortrialProspective Observational Studyen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Cancer Services
General Surgery and Gastroenterology
Health Administration

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.