Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/903
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNew, Peter-
dc.contributor.otherDillon, Louise-
dc.date2015-07-
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-22T02:48:33Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-22T02:48:33Z-
dc.date.issued2015-07-
dc.identifier.citationTop Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015 Summer;21(3):250-6en_US
dc.identifier.issn1082-0744en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/903-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Urodynamics (UDs) are routine in traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), but there are few reports regarding nontraumatic spinal cord myelopathy (SCM) patients. PURPOSE: To describe the neurogenic bladder and UD outcomes in SCM patients and determine whether the UD recommendations result in clinically important changes to bladder management. METHODS: This retrospective case study examined a series of SCM patients admitted to a spinal rehabilitation service who underwent UDs between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2010. RESULTS: Sixty-five UD tests were performed a median of 7 months post SCM. Most (n = 34; 57%) patients were male, and the median age was 60 years. Most patients (n = 46; 77%) were paraplegic and were continent of urine (n = 38; 58%). Thirty-five (46%) patients voided on sensation, 26 (40%) performed intermittent self-catheterization, and 9 (14%) had an indwelling catheter. The most common UD finding was overactive detrusor with no dysynergia (n = 31; 48%), followed by overactive detrusor with sphincter dysynergia (n = 16; 25%) and detrusor areflexia/underactive (n = 12; 18%). Key UD findings were median cystometric capacity 414 mL (interquartile range [IQR], 300-590), median maximum detrusor contraction 49.5 cmH2O (IQR, 25-85), and median residual volume post voiding 100 mL (IQR, 5-200). The recommendations for changes to bladder management following UDs resulted in clinically important changes to existing strategies in 57 studies (88%). CONCLUSIONS: Future studies should ascertain whether our screening protocol is appropriate, and a longer-term follow-up should examine the relationship between UD recommendations and prevention of complications.en_US
dc.publisherThomas Land Publishersen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4568088/pdf/sci-21-250.pdf-
dc.subjectPrognosisen_US
dc.subjectSpinal Cord Diseasesen_US
dc.subjectPhysiopathologyen_US
dc.subjectRehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectUrinary Bladder, Neurogenicen_US
dc.subjectUrination Disordersen_US
dc.subjectUrodynamicsen_US
dc.subjectSelf-Catheterizationen_US
dc.subjectIndwelling Catheteren_US
dc.subjectTraumatic Spinal Cord Injuryen_US
dc.subjectSCIen_US
dc.subjectSpinal Cord Myelopathyen_US
dc.subjectSCMen_US
dc.subjectNeurogenic Bladderen_US
dc.subjectRecommendationsen_US
dc.subjectMonash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.titleNeurogenic bladder and urodynamic outcomes in patients with spinal cord myelopathy.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1310/sci2103-250en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleTopics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitationen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26363592en_US
dc.description.affiliatesSpinal Rehabilitation Service, Caulfield Hospital, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesContinence Service and Aged Care, Caulfield Hospital, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesMonash University, School of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.type.studyortrialRetrospective studiesen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Neurosciences
Rehabilitation
UroRenal, Vascular

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat  
neurogenic bladder.pdf179.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.