Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/923
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBotti, Mari-
dc.contributor.authorWood, Beverley-
dc.contributor.authorRedley, Bernice-
dc.contributor.otherGraan, S. M.-
dc.date2015-10-
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-24T05:39:07Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-24T05:39:07Z-
dc.date.issued2016-08-
dc.identifier.citation2016 Aug;29(3):165-71en_US
dc.identifier.issn1036-7314en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/923-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Standardising handover processes and content, and using context-specific checklists are proposed as solutions to mitigate risks for preventable errors and patient harm associated with clinical handovers. OBJECTIVES: Adapt existing tools to standardise nursing handover from the intensive care unit (ICU) to the cardiac ward and assess patient safety risks before and after pilot implementation. METHODS: A three-stage, pre-post interrupted time-series design was used. Data were collected using naturalistic observations and audio-recording of 40 handovers and focus groups with 11 nurses. In Stage 1, examination of existing practice using observation of 20 handovers and a focus group interview provided baseline data. In Stage 2, existing tools for high-risk handovers were adapted to create tools specific to ICU-to-ward handovers. The adapted tools were introduced to staff using principles from evidence-based frameworks for practice change. In Stage 3, observation of 20 handovers and a focus group with five nurses were used to verify the design of tools to standardise handover by ICU nurses transferring care of cardiac surgical patients to ward nurses. RESULTS: Stage 1 data revealed variable and unsafe ICU-to-ward handover practices: incomplete ward preparation; failure to check patient identity; handover located away from patients; and information gaps. Analyses informed adaptation of process, content and checklist tools to standardise handover in Stage 2. Compared with baseline data, Stage 3 observations revealed nurses used the tools consistently, ward readiness to receive patients (10% vs 95%), checking patient identity (0% vs 100%), delivery of handover at the bedside (25% vs 100%) and communication of complete information (40% vs 100%) improved. CONCLUSION: Clinician adoption of tools to standardise ICU-to-ward handover of cardiac surgical patients reduced handover variability and patient safety risks. The study outcomes provide context-specific tools to guide handover processes and delivery of verbal content, a safety checklist, and a risk recognition matrix.en_US
dc.publisherElsevier Australiaen_US
dc.subjectPreventable Rrrorsen_US
dc.subjectIntensive Care Uniten_US
dc.subjectPatient Safety and Qualityen_US
dc.subjectStandardised Frameworken_US
dc.subjectClinical Handoveren_US
dc.subjectICUen_US
dc.subjectCardiac Warden_US
dc.subjectHandover Processesen_US
dc.subjectRisk Recognition Matrixen_US
dc.subjectObservationsen_US
dc.subjectClinical Handoversen_US
dc.subjectContext-specific Checklistsen_US
dc.subjectPatient Safety Risksen_US
dc.subjectEvidence-based Frameworksen_US
dc.subjectSafety Checklisten_US
dc.subjectCritical Care Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.subjectEpworth Deakin Centre for Clinical Nursing Research, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.subjectCardiac Sciences Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia-
dc.titleNursing handover from ICU to cardiac ward: standardised tools to reduce safety risks.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aucc.2015.09.002en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleAustralian Critical Care : official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN)en_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26515413en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDeakin University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Burwood Highway, Burwood 3125, Australia.en_US
dc.type.studyortrialProspective Observational Studyen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Cardiac Sciences
Critical Care
Health Administration

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.