Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/949
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrazenor, Graeme-
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-06T04:46:46Z-
dc.date.available2016-12-06T04:46:46Z-
dc.date.issued2007-01-
dc.identifier.citationSpine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jan 1;32(1):63-71.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0362-2436en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/949-
dc.description.abstractSTUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of 73 consecutive patients who underwent cervical corpectomy and anterior strut fixation over 3 or more disc levels between July 1989 and May 1999. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of cervical spine fixation by autologous strut graft from iliac crest or fibula versus a titanium prosthesis without bone graft. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Strut grafting after multilevel anterior cervical corpectomy remains a challenging procedure, with published dislocation rates from 0% to 71%, and nonunion from 0% to 54%. This paper describes a quicker and easier alternative to the use of a bone strut, imparting a very high degree of immediate spinal stability, and osseous integration equivalent to bone fusion. METHODS: Thirty-eight bone-graft operations and 38 titanium prosthesis operations were performed on 73 patients between July 24, 1989 and May 20, 1999. Average follow-up was 53.2 months (range 19.8-134). RESULTS: The group of patients who received the prosthesis was significantly older than the bone-grafted group and required significantly more segments excised, but operation times were significantly shorter than for the bone strut operation. The titanium prosthesis had a lower incidence of dislodgement in the early postoperative period (1/38 vs. 4/38 for bone struts) but a higher rate of late reoperation (4/38 vs. 1/38 for bone struts). The SF-36 scores in the domain of Physical Function (only) were significantly higher in the bone-grafted group (P = 0.016, Mann Whitney), consistent with the difference in mean ages of the 2 groups. The groups were indistinguishable by Odom criteria, patient verdict, pain scores, analgesic intake, length of hospital stay, radiologic fusion rate, and residual symptoms. CONCLUSION: A titanium rod and buttress prosthesis may be a faster and easier alternative to conventional iliac crest/fibula autograft after multisegmental cervical vertebral corpectomy.en_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.subjectBone Transplantationen_US
dc.subjectStrut Graftingen_US
dc.subjectCervical Vertebraeen_US
dc.subjectRadiographyen_US
dc.subjectInternal Fixatorsen_US
dc.subjectProsthesis Implantationen_US
dc.subjectSpinal Fusionen_US
dc.subjectCervical Spine Fixationen_US
dc.subjectOsseous Integrationen_US
dc.subjectCervical Corpectomyen_US
dc.subjectAnterior Strut Fixationen_US
dc.subjectAutologous Strut Graften_US
dc.subjectCervical Spine Fixationen_US
dc.subjectTitanium Prosthesisen_US
dc.subjectEpworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.titleComparison of multisegment anterior cervical fixation using bone strut graft versus a titanium rod and buttress prosthesis: analysis of outcome with long-term follow-up and interview by independent physician.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/01.brs.0000250304.24001.24en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleSpineen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17202894en_US
dc.type.studyortrialRetrospective studiesen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Musculoskeletal
Neurosciences

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.