Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2080
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Gavin-
dc.contributor.authorBanky, Megan-
dc.contributor.authorGill, Renee-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-14T03:46:32Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-14T03:46:32Z-
dc.date.issued2022-04-
dc.identifier.citationJ Head Trauma Rehabil . 2022 Mar-Apr 01;37(2):96-103en_US
dc.identifier.issn0885-9701en_US
dc.identifier.issn1550-509Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11434/2080-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Reduced walking speed is common following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Walking speed reserve (WSR) refers to the ability to increase walking speed on demand and is calculated as the difference between self-selected and fast walking speeds. Walking speed reserve is important for adaptive functional mobility in the community. Predictors of WSR following TBI are yet to be determined. The aim of the study was to identify whether static balance or ankle power generation (APG) was a stronger predictor of WSR following TBI. Setting: A major metropolitan rehabilitation hospital. Participants: A total of 92 individuals receiving inpatient physiotherapy for mobility limitations following TBI were recruited. Design: A cross-sectional study. Methods: Walking speed (self-selected and fast), APG, and a summed single-leg stance scores were measured. The ability to increase walking speed on demand by 0.20 m/s or more defined WSR. Correlations, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to investigate independent relationships between WSR, APG, and static balance. Results: Fifty participants (54.3%) had a WSR of 0.20 m/s or more. The strongest predictor of WSR was APG (odds ratio [OR] = 3.34; 95% CI, 1.50-7.43) when compared with static balance (OR = 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06). The ROC curve demonstrated that APG could accurately discriminate between individuals with a WSR from those without (AUC [area under the ROC curve] = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.88). The APG cutoff score identified on the curve that maximized combined sensitivity (92.0%) and specificity (54.8%) was 0.75 W/kg. Conclusion: Following TBI, APG was a stronger predictor of WSR than static balance. Clinicians should consider interventions that preferentially target APG in order to increase WSR for community mobility.en_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluweren_US
dc.subjectTraumatic Brain Injuryen_US
dc.subjectTBIen_US
dc.subjectWalking Speed Reserveen_US
dc.subjectWSRen_US
dc.subjectAdaptive Functional Mobilityen_US
dc.subjectPredictorsen_US
dc.subjectStatic Balanceen_US
dc.subjectAnkle Power generationen_US
dc.subjectAPGen_US
dc.subjectPhysiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectRehabilitation, Mental Health and Chronic Pain Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.subjectPhysiotherapy Department, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.titleAnkle power generation has a greater influence on walking speed reserve than balance following traumatic brain injury.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/HTR.0000000000000684en_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitationen_US
dc.description.affiliatesThe University of Melbourneen_US
dc.type.studyortrialCross-Sectional Studyen_US
dc.type.contenttypeTexten_US
Appears in Collections:Rehabilitation

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.