Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2080
Title: | Ankle power generation has a greater influence on walking speed reserve than balance following traumatic brain injury. |
Epworth Authors: | Williams, Gavin Banky, Megan Gill, Renee |
Keywords: | Traumatic Brain Injury TBI Walking Speed Reserve WSR Adaptive Functional Mobility Predictors Static Balance Ankle Power generation APG Physiotherapy Rehabilitation, Mental Health and Chronic Pain Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia Physiotherapy Department, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia |
Issue Date: | Apr-2022 |
Publisher: | Wolters Kluwer |
Citation: | J Head Trauma Rehabil . 2022 Mar-Apr 01;37(2):96-103 |
Abstract: | Objective: Reduced walking speed is common following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Walking speed reserve (WSR) refers to the ability to increase walking speed on demand and is calculated as the difference between self-selected and fast walking speeds. Walking speed reserve is important for adaptive functional mobility in the community. Predictors of WSR following TBI are yet to be determined. The aim of the study was to identify whether static balance or ankle power generation (APG) was a stronger predictor of WSR following TBI. Setting: A major metropolitan rehabilitation hospital. Participants: A total of 92 individuals receiving inpatient physiotherapy for mobility limitations following TBI were recruited. Design: A cross-sectional study. Methods: Walking speed (self-selected and fast), APG, and a summed single-leg stance scores were measured. The ability to increase walking speed on demand by 0.20 m/s or more defined WSR. Correlations, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to investigate independent relationships between WSR, APG, and static balance. Results: Fifty participants (54.3%) had a WSR of 0.20 m/s or more. The strongest predictor of WSR was APG (odds ratio [OR] = 3.34; 95% CI, 1.50-7.43) when compared with static balance (OR = 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06). The ROC curve demonstrated that APG could accurately discriminate between individuals with a WSR from those without (AUC [area under the ROC curve] = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.88). The APG cutoff score identified on the curve that maximized combined sensitivity (92.0%) and specificity (54.8%) was 0.75 W/kg. Conclusion: Following TBI, APG was a stronger predictor of WSR than static balance. Clinicians should consider interventions that preferentially target APG in order to increase WSR for community mobility. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11434/2080 |
DOI: | 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000684 |
ISSN: | 0885-9701 1550-509X |
Journal Title: | Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation |
Type: | Journal Article |
Affiliated Organisations: | The University of Melbourne |
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: | Cross-Sectional Study |
Appears in Collections: | Rehabilitation |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.