Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11434/923
Title: | Nursing handover from ICU to cardiac ward: standardised tools to reduce safety risks. |
Epworth Authors: | Botti, Mari Wood, Beverley Redley, Bernice |
Other Authors: | Graan, S. M. |
Keywords: | Preventable Rrrors Intensive Care Unit Patient Safety and Quality Standardised Framework Clinical Handover ICU Cardiac Ward Handover Processes Risk Recognition Matrix Observations Clinical Handovers Context-specific Checklists Patient Safety Risks Evidence-based Frameworks Safety Checklist Critical Care Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia Epworth Deakin Centre for Clinical Nursing Research, Victoria, Australia Cardiac Sciences Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia |
Issue Date: | Aug-2016 |
Publisher: | Elsevier Australia |
Citation: | 2016 Aug;29(3):165-71 |
Abstract: | BACKGROUND: Standardising handover processes and content, and using context-specific checklists are proposed as solutions to mitigate risks for preventable errors and patient harm associated with clinical handovers. OBJECTIVES: Adapt existing tools to standardise nursing handover from the intensive care unit (ICU) to the cardiac ward and assess patient safety risks before and after pilot implementation. METHODS: A three-stage, pre-post interrupted time-series design was used. Data were collected using naturalistic observations and audio-recording of 40 handovers and focus groups with 11 nurses. In Stage 1, examination of existing practice using observation of 20 handovers and a focus group interview provided baseline data. In Stage 2, existing tools for high-risk handovers were adapted to create tools specific to ICU-to-ward handovers. The adapted tools were introduced to staff using principles from evidence-based frameworks for practice change. In Stage 3, observation of 20 handovers and a focus group with five nurses were used to verify the design of tools to standardise handover by ICU nurses transferring care of cardiac surgical patients to ward nurses. RESULTS: Stage 1 data revealed variable and unsafe ICU-to-ward handover practices: incomplete ward preparation; failure to check patient identity; handover located away from patients; and information gaps. Analyses informed adaptation of process, content and checklist tools to standardise handover in Stage 2. Compared with baseline data, Stage 3 observations revealed nurses used the tools consistently, ward readiness to receive patients (10% vs 95%), checking patient identity (0% vs 100%), delivery of handover at the bedside (25% vs 100%) and communication of complete information (40% vs 100%) improved. CONCLUSION: Clinician adoption of tools to standardise ICU-to-ward handover of cardiac surgical patients reduced handover variability and patient safety risks. The study outcomes provide context-specific tools to guide handover processes and delivery of verbal content, a safety checklist, and a risk recognition matrix. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11434/923 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.aucc.2015.09.002 |
PubMed URL: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26515413 |
ISSN: | 1036-7314 |
Journal Title: | Australian Critical Care : official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN) |
Type: | Journal Article |
Affiliated Organisations: | Deakin University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Burwood Highway, Burwood 3125, Australia. |
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: | Prospective Observational Study |
Appears in Collections: | Cardiac Sciences Critical Care Health Administration |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in Epworth are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.